Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Satellite6 does not honour the mac address specified for provisioning via compute-resource Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.2.9 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: A) Through hammer: 1) hammer host create --hostgroup rhev --name host4 --mac 52:54:00:e4:15:26 --managed true --build true --location Pune --organization-id 1 --enabled true --compute-profile rhev --compute-resource rhevm B) Through api: curl -H "Accept:application/json,version=2" -H "Content-Type:application/json" -X POST -u admin:redhat -k -d "{\"host\":{\"organization_id\":1,\"enabled\":1,\"build\":1,\"hostgroup_id\":2,\"compute_profile_name\":\"rhev\",\"compute_resource_name\":\"rhevm\",\"owner_id\":null,\"interfaces_attributes\": [ {\"provision\":1,\"domain_id\":1,\"mac\":\"00:50:56:91:7c:41\",\"primary\":1,\"type\":\"Nic::Managed\",\"ip\":\"192.168.100.99\",\"managed\":1,\"subnet_id\":1} ],\"name\":\"test123\",\"managed\":1,\"location_id\":2,\"owner_type\":\"User\",\"overwrite\":0}}" https://satellite.example.com/api/hosts Actual results: Vm gets populated with a different MAC address. Expected results: VM should be built with same MAC address as provided on hammer or api. Additional info: 1) I am using rhevm 4.0. 2) This issue is also observed at the customer end where vmware is being used. 3) This works as expected when provisioned through webui
This is not supported, creating VM via Satellite6 always generates random MAC address.
Just quick update - we don't see this as bug, virtualization/cloud workflow is based on fact that compute resource generates MAC address and Satellite reads that. This RFE is on our backlog, no plans for now.
I can also reproduce this in Sat 6.4 using WebUI, using both API v3 and v4.
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.