> Another thing, I don't know to what degree there is an issue with
> singular and plural, I am merely asking, because I found an entry 's' to
> be translated. I've found a few such entries in the perl code, and all
> these referred to the 's' to be appended to a singular word, in order to
> create its plural. This does only apply to english and singular/plural
> needs to be treated as two different words in translations, if used. If
> there is a way to use a form that applies to both cases, good, if there
> needs to be made a distinction between singular and plural, these must
> be separate entries, one for the singular form, and one for the
plural form.


Yeah, you raise an excellent point.  We need to fix this.  Can't have
the code pluralize a word based on a suffix.  Instead it has to lookup
two entire different trans-units.  Thanks for catching this.