Bug 1468972 - [GSS][RFE] Improve geo-replication logging [NEEDINFO]
[GSS][RFE] Improve geo-replication logging
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: geo-replication (Show other bugs)
3.2
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Aravinda VK
Rahul Hinduja
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks: 1408949 RHGS-usability-bug-GSS
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-07-10 02:51 EDT by Bipin Kunal
Modified: 2017-10-17 10:11 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
avishwan: needinfo? (bkunal)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bipin Kunal 2017-07-10 02:51:22 EDT
Description of problem: Current geo-replication logging is poor. Plenty of scope of geo-replication improvement.

With the current log it is very difficult to understand the place of failure. Logging should be a bit more informative. 

Geo-replication log file naming should even be improved. It lacks filename readability. With file name it becomes very difficult to relate it with what that log file is for.
Comment 3 Aravinda VK 2017-10-10 05:24:59 EDT
(In reply to Bipin Kunal from comment #0)
> Description of problem: Current geo-replication logging is poor. Plenty of
> scope of geo-replication improvement.
> 
> With the current log it is very difficult to understand the place of
> failure. Logging should be a bit more informative. 

Many patches merged in upstream with Log improvements, will include one more patch to address the review comments of patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17551/

> 
> Geo-replication log file naming should even be improved. It lacks filename
> readability. With file name it becomes very difficult to relate it with what
> that log file is for.

This we can't implement in 3.4 release because file path change is not acceptable for 3.12 upstream(Already released, no path change will be accepted for minor release). Please open new RFE for the same.
Comment 4 Kotresh HR 2017-10-10 07:11:11 EDT
The following patch is already in 3.3 which addresses few improvements.

https://review.gluster.org/16997

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.