Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1469248

Summary: [RFE] add the ability to schedule automatic publish and promotion of content views
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Jeffrey Warne <jwarne>
Component: Content ViewsAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Lai <ltran>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2.12CC: amaluje, bbuckingham, bkearney, chris.snell, claudio_ruwer, dkh, gpadholi, grbrown, hmore, ionutjula, janarula, jbhatia, Jordan.T.Larson, kagarwal, kkinge, kladiv, kupadhya, nsamant, rajgupta, rballang, rjerrido, saydas, smane, sokeeffe, sraut, suarora, tc, tomp, unixhosting, vc.lakshmi.athoti, vwariyal, wlehman
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-03 10:48:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeffrey Warne 2017-07-10 17:45:47 UTC
It would be great to be able to have the option either on a scheduled bases and/or automatically with sync plans have the related content views publish and promote new versions of themselves. Likewise, it would be great if there was an option to specify how many versions of content views should be retained so that when publishing/promoting a new version of the content view that it automatically removes the older versions past the number specified.

Comment 1 Claudio 2018-02-19 15:17:46 UTC
+1

Comment 2 Alejandro 2018-03-01 15:50:05 UTC
+1

Comment 3 Torsten 2018-03-20 14:17:31 UTC
+1 ... at least

Comment 5 NIST 184 Admin 2018-06-05 16:27:51 UTC
+1

Comment 7 Danial khatib 2018-09-18 12:58:30 UTC
+1

Comment 9 Tom Pinard 2019-03-01 11:31:30 UTC
+1
Both of these things can be done via shell script.  I don't see why they can't just be incorporated into a simple selectable option in the UI.

Comment 12 Claudio Ruwer 2019-10-21 16:11:53 UTC
+1

Comment 13 Ionut Jula 2019-11-08 19:02:26 UTC
+1

Comment 15 Sean O'Keeffe 2020-02-03 10:48:55 UTC
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support.

Note, this should be possible with Ansible modules (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630433)