Bug 1469426 - Support clients configuration with external Ceph clusters
Summary: Support clients configuration with external Ceph clusters
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Ceph-Ansible
Version: 3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 3.0
Assignee: Guillaume Abrioux
QA Contact: Giulio Fidente
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1386911 1472811
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-07-11 09:02 UTC by Giulio Fidente
Modified: 2018-01-29 14:29 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-ansible-3.0.0-0.1.rc7.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph-ansible_3.0.0~rc7-2redhat1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-05 23:35:34 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github ceph ceph-ansible issues 1670 0 None None None 2017-07-14 09:55:20 UTC
Github ceph ceph-ansible issues 1848 0 None None None 2017-09-01 20:43:09 UTC
Github ceph ceph-ansible pull 1727 0 None None None 2017-08-02 14:54:57 UTC
Github ceph ceph-ansible pull 1749 0 None None None 2017-08-29 07:20:54 UTC
Github ceph ceph-ansible pull 1850 0 None None None 2017-09-02 02:56:26 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:3387 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 3.0 bug fix and enhancement update 2017-12-06 03:03:45 UTC

Description Giulio Fidente 2017-07-11 09:02:58 UTC
Description of problem:
It is important for the integration in TripleO that we allow for configuration of the clients without configuring other roles.

In this scenario the list of mons and the fsid will be given by the user as input and, together with keys:, should make it possible to configure a client without requiring access to the mons role.

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-07-24 17:06:55 UTC
That commit is not yet on master.

Comment 5 Giulio Fidente 2017-08-18 09:58:15 UTC
Guillaume do we need to merge https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1749 as well to be able to use the new feature?

Comment 6 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-08-28 22:08:08 UTC
Sebastien, Giulio, would you please confirm this BZ is completely resolved in master today?

Comment 7 seb 2017-08-29 07:20:55 UTC
Ken, https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1749 should have fixed that, we need to test now.

Comment 10 Harish NV Rao 2017-08-30 12:05:33 UTC
@Seb, couple of questions:
1) Is this fix going to be in Ubuntu based ceph-ansible also?
2) What is the input format to specify clients to be configured?

Comment 11 seb 2017-08-30 12:38:09 UTC
@Harish, the fix will work for both Ubuntu and Red Hat systems.
To configure a client just add a [clients] section in your inventory with the hostname you want to be become a client.

Comment 12 John Fulton 2017-09-01 20:43:09 UTC
I am adding this issue as a dependency here. Because of this issue I propose this get moved back to ASSIGNED though I am happy to try to send a PR to address it next. 

 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/issues/1848

Comment 13 John Fulton 2017-09-02 02:56:26 UTC
I was able to deploy an overcloud, whose client configuration was done by ceph-ansible, which successfully uses external ceph clusters (able to create cinder volumes and upload glance images) by using the following: 

- https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1850
- https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1714271

Comment 14 John Fulton 2017-09-07 16:30:00 UTC
I am setting this to POST as the following upstream changes have merged.

- https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1850
- https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1714271

Comment 15 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-09-07 16:37:01 UTC
Would you please tag and announce a new upstream version with this change so we can rebase to it downstream?

Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2017-12-05 23:35:34 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3387


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.