Description of problem: SELinux is preventing ntpdate-wrapper from 'execute_no_trans' accesses on the file /usr/sbin/ntpdate. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that ntpdate-wrapper should be allowed execute_no_trans access on the ntpdate file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c 'ntpdate-wrapper' --raw | audit2allow -M my-ntpdatewrapper # semodule -X 300 -i my-ntpdatewrapper.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:ntpd_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:ntpdate_exec_t:s0 Target Objects /usr/sbin/ntpdate [ file ] Source ntpdate-wrapper Source Path ntpdate-wrapper Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages Target RPM Packages ntpdate-4.2.8p10-1.fc26.x86_64 Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.13.1-259.fc26.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 5 16:21:56 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 3 First Seen 2017-07-12 21:01:58 AEST Last Seen 2017-07-14 09:59:00 AEST Local ID f20e823f-7d96-4e71-a0fe-357c4c3caf0e Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1499990340.351:217): avc: denied { execute_no_trans } for pid=1693 comm="ntpdate-wrapper" path="/usr/sbin/ntpdate" dev="sdb4" ino=2361164 scontext=system_u:system_r:ntpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:ntpdate_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 Hash: ntpdate-wrapper,ntpd_t,ntpdate_exec_t,file,execute_no_trans Version-Release number of selected component: selinux-policy-3.13.1-259.fc26.noarch Additional info: component: selinux-policy reporter: libreport-2.9.1 hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 type: libreport
Description of problem: fail on startup Version-Release number of selected component: selinux-policy-3.13.1-260.1.fc26.noarch Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.9.1 hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64 type: libreport
Trevor, Where is ntpdate-wrapper file stored? Thanks, Lukas.
I could find no file ntpdate-wrapper on my machine, so this is a total mystery to me, but most of SELinux is a mystery to me. trevor ~ which ntpdate-wrapper /usr/bin/which: no ntpdate-wrapper in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/home/trevor/.local/bin:/home/trevor/bin) trevor ~ sudo which ntpdate-wrapper which: no ntpdate-wrapper in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin) trevor ~ cd / trevor / sudo find . -name ntpdate-wrapper find: ‘./run/user/1000/gvfs’: Permission denied trevor /
Try locate ntpdate-wrapper
sudo locate ntpdate-wrapper /usr/libexec/ntpdate-wrapper
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '26'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.