Hide Forgot
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040406 Description of problem: I have 2 RPMs as follows: - 1st RPM, foo, Provides: bar (amongst other things) - 2nd RPM is called bar (and so automatically provides bar) If I do: # rpm -U foo.rpm # rpm -U bar.rpm the second command causes foo to be erased. Is this the correct behavior? Note, if I update them in the reverse order, or if I update them both on the same command line, or if I install with "-i" instead of updating, foo does not get erased - both RPMs will be successfully installed. Therefore, I'm inclined to think this is a bug? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.2.1-4.2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a simple RPM, foo, which "Provides: bar" 2. Create a simple RPM, bar 3. rpm -U foo.rpm 4. rpm -q foo # Result: foo is installed 4. rpm -U bar.rpm 5. rpm -q foo Actual Results: Result: foo has been erased. Expected Results: Expected: both foo and bar should be installed. # rpm -q --whatprovides foo should show both RPMs provinding the "bar" capability Additional info:
No bug here. --install has implicit promise to never erase any package, so even Obsoletes: are ignored during install. --upgrade is by Provides: name, not package Name:, although each package Name: has a Provide: silently added. So this is the expected behavior.