Bug 1474740 - /etc/redhat-storage-release file containing the image name is missing in rhgs-block provisioner container image
/etc/redhat-storage-release file containing the image name is missing in rhgs...
Status: ON_QA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhgs-gluster-block-prov-container (Show other bugs)
cns-3.6
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: CNS 3.6
Assigned To: Mohamed Ashiq
Prasanth
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1445448
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-07-25 06:01 EDT by Humble Chirammal
Modified: 2017-07-26 09:31 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Humble Chirammal 2017-07-25 06:01:38 EDT
Description of problem:

Description of problem:

/etc/redhat-storage-release file containing the image name is missing in the rhgs-block provisioner container image

#####
# oc rsh <gluster block provisioner>
sh-4.2# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 Beta (Maipo)
sh-4.2# cat /etc/redhat-storage-release
cat: /etc/redhat-storage-release: No such file or directory
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 5 Humble Chirammal 2017-07-25 06:10:24 EDT
The mentioned file will have below content :

Red Hat Gluster Storage Block Provisioner(Container)
Comment 9 Sudhir 2017-07-26 09:31:53 EDT
CNS is good. We intend to use that as an acronym for Container Native Storage. Let's start using it. Also, Prasanth mentioned that we use the version number in the name, not sure why but that has been the convention so far. 

If that is useful, please add. I am afraid folks may use the name to guess the version number which may not be the best way or accurate always to determine the version number.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.