+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1474320 +++ Description of problem: When restarting VDSM while VM is running and after that powering off the VM, virsh report that VM state is running, by looking on the UI the VM is down. Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 71 golden_env_mixed_virtio_0 running Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ovirt-engine-4.1.4.2-0.1.el7.noarch vdsm-4.19.23-1.el7ev.x86_64 How reproducible: 100 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run VM 2. Restart vdsm 3. Power off VM Actual results: Virsh report that VM state still running Expected results: VM should be down Additional info: --- Additional comment from Ori Ben Sasson on 2017-07-24 08:27 EDT --- --- Additional comment from Michal Skrivanek on 2017-07-24 09:03:12 EDT --- would appreciate vdsm logs with debug level --- Additional comment from Ori Ben Sasson on 2017-07-24 09:43 EDT --- --- Additional comment from Ori Ben Sasson on 2017-07-24 09:43:47 EDT --- (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #2) > would appreciate vdsm logs with debug level done --- Additional comment from Meni Yakove on 2017-07-24 09:48:38 EDT --- Reproduce on RHEL 7.3 as well --- Additional comment from Michal Skrivanek on 2017-07-24 10:11:00 EDT --- Thanks. so far it points to a vdsm recovery problem, not really a recent regression --- Additional comment from Michal Skrivanek on 2017-07-25 01:32:51 EDT --- --- Additional comment from Michal Skrivanek on 2017-07-25 01:59:02 EDT --- yay, it is a recent regression Francesco, please revert Ia4277334c36920bdc275343e3520d2f39851695f I2af090425961361a111360eb66a56899684f2eae --- Additional comment from Michal Skrivanek on 2017-07-25 02:25:53 EDT --- the regression was introduced in 4.19.21 --- Additional comment from Francesco Romani on 2017-07-25 03:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #8) > yay, it is a recent regression > Francesco, please revert > Ia4277334c36920bdc275343e3520d2f39851695f > I2af090425961361a111360eb66a56899684f2eae Rationale for the revert: 1. Ia4277334c36920bdc275343e3520d2f39851695f This is actually where we break: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78938/3/vdsm/virt/vmdevices/storage.py if not hasattr(self, '_diskType'): if (self.device in ("cdrom", "floppy") or not utils.isBlockDevice(self.path)): self.diskType = DISK_TYPE.FILE else: self.diskType = DISK_TYPE.BLOCK "self.path" may not yet be available at this time in recovery. And the logs provided here indeed demonstrate that it is not available. 2. I2af090425961361a111360eb66a56899684f2eae just depends on the other one, no other reason. This means we need to check master for the same bug. --- Additional comment from Francesco Romani on 2017-07-25 03:04:24 EDT --- Denis, please check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474320#c10 --- Additional comment from Francesco Romani on 2017-07-25 06:56:59 EDT --- for *this* bug, we will go on with the revert, to quickly unblock 4.1.4. The broader issue deserves more work, currently ongoing on master branch. --- Additional comment from Michael Burman on 2017-07-25 10:08:14 EDT --- Verified on - vdsm-4.19.24-1.el7ev.x86_64 --- Additional comment from Michael Burman on 2017-07-25 14:11:05 EDT --- HI Francesco, Can i ask why patches were added to this bug after it was moved to ON_QA and verified? Should this be retested on next build? --- Additional comment from Nir Soffer on 2017-07-25 14:31:29 EDT --- I added the real fix to this issue to master, we can remove the extra patches from this bug and clone or open a new bug for the master fix. --- Additional comment from Michael Burman on 2017-07-26 01:15:25 EDT --- (In reply to Nir Soffer from comment #15) > I added the real fix to this issue to master, we can remove the extra patches > from this bug and clone or open a new bug for the master fix. I believe this is exactly what we should do. This report was verified on 4.1.4 and no patches should be added here any more. Please create a proper bug for master in order to test this real fix on master 4.2 as well. Thanks --- Additional comment from Gil Klein on 2017-07-26 02:00:00 EDT --- (In reply to Michael Burman from comment #16) > (In reply to Nir Soffer from comment #15) > > I added the real fix to this issue to master, we can remove the extra patches > > from this bug and clone or open a new bug for the master fix. > > I believe this is exactly what we should do. This report was verified on > 4.1.4 and no patches should be added here any more. > Please create a proper bug for master in order to test this real fix on > master 4.2 as well. Thanks +1 This is verified for 4.1.4 after the revert, are should be retested for 4.1.5 --- Additional comment from Francesco Romani on 2017-07-26 03:00:33 EDT --- (In reply to Michael Burman from comment #14) > HI Francesco, > > Can i ask why patches were added to this bug after it was moved to ON_QA and > verified? > Should this be retested on next build? Answered in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474320#c15 - clearing NEEDINFO.
This bug report has Keywords: Regression or TestBlocker. Since no regressions or test blockers are allowed between releases, it is also being identified as a blocker for this release. Please resolve ASAP.
this issue is already fixed. Further proposed changes are part of the libgfapi development and needs to be trakced there