Bug 147571 - pexpect fails to build on x86_64 due to differing library paths
Summary: pexpect fails to build on x86_64 due to differing library paths
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pexpect
Version: 3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Panu Matilainen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-02-09 13:56 UTC by Toshio Kuratomi
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-10 20:59:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to update macros so x86_64 builds work (2.22 KB, patch)
2005-02-09 14:05 UTC, Toshio Kuratomi
no flags Details | Diff

Description Toshio Kuratomi 2005-02-09 13:56:53 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
The build of pexpect on x86_64 fails.  This is due to listing the files to be included using the arch specific directories.  Because x86_54 is multilib we need to put them into the arch independent directories instead.  Updating to the macros recommended in the latest fedora-rpmdeveltools fixes this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pexpect-0.99-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. On x86_64 attempt rpmbuild -ba pexpect.spec
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  Errors as seen at http://fedoraproject.org/extras/3/build-logs/x86_64/pexpect.log

Expected Results:  Build completes with a pexpect rpm package.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Toshio Kuratomi 2005-02-09 14:05:10 UTC
Created attachment 110868 [details]
Patch to update macros so x86_64 builds work

Patch against the CVS devel branch to get the x86_64 build to work.  This
updates the spec to use the latest macros specified in
fedora-rpmdevtools::spectemplate-python.spec

Tested on x86_64 by Aurelian Bompard:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-February/msg00194.html

Comment 2 Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-02-10 19:26:48 UTC
Panu, if the patch here it's okay (it's okay in my eyes) just say and
I'll commit.

Comment 3 Panu Matilainen 2005-02-10 19:43:00 UTC
Sure, go ahead. For these cases if things seem ok just go ahead and
commit, no need to get "approval" from me. I'm kinda out of business
anyway until I get CVS access (which has nothing to do with RH, I just
need to get an "OK" from my employees lawyers who are being sloooooow
about this)

Comment 4 Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-02-10 20:22:11 UTC
>Sure, go ahead.
Committed and build requested.

>For these cases if things seem ok just go ahead and
>commit, no need to get "approval" from me

Okay. 

Panu, Toshio, can any of you close this bug? Thanks.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.