Bug 147752 - inotify support
inotify support
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gamin (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Veillard
: Patch
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-02-10 17:31 EST by Felipe Alfaro Solana
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-11 06:04:54 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
gamin.spec file (5.36 KB, text/plain)
2005-02-10 17:31 EST, Felipe Alfaro Solana
no flags Details
inotify's backend support for gamin (4.02 KB, patch)
2005-02-10 17:33 EST, Felipe Alfaro Solana
no flags Details | Diff
Diff for the .spec file (896 bytes, patch)
2005-02-11 05:27 EST, Felipe Alfaro Solana
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 17:31:58 EST
Description of problem:
I have made some minor modifications to the gamin .spec file to include inotify
backend support. Credit goes to Robert Love for the patch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.0.23-1

How reproducible:
N/A

Steps to Reproduce:
N/A
  
Actual results:
Patch gamin to add inotify backend support.

Expected results:
N/A

Additional info:
See attached patch and .spec file.
Comment 1 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 17:31:59 EST
Created attachment 110946 [details]
gamin.spec file
Comment 2 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 17:33:00 EST
Created attachment 110947 [details]
inotify's backend support for gamin
Comment 3 Daniel Veillard 2005-02-10 17:47:56 EST
How does this relates to patches made by John McCutchan ?
Like for example:
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gamin-list/2005-February/msg00005.html

What is the diff for the spec file ? There is a spec file
in the gamin tarball.
In general I don't think bugzilla is the right place for these discussions,
the gamin mailing-list is.

Daniel
Comment 4 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-11 05:26:33 EST
I did not intend this to be a discussion, but a proposal for inclusion.
The attached patch here is identical to the one posted in gamin-list by John
McCutchan. I erroneously credited Robert Love for the patch instead of John
McCutchan. Robert deserves credit for the kernel patch.
Comment 5 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-11 05:27:33 EST
Created attachment 110960 [details]
Diff for the .spec file
Comment 6 Daniel Veillard 2005-02-11 06:04:54 EST
Already applied upstream, no diff needed for the spec file, this will
be included in the next release, and I don't think keeping patches
within source RPMs while they are integrated upstream and doesn't work
for the current shipped kernel to be a good idea. All this really need
to be done upstream, on the list, any other options is just a waste of
time.

Daniel

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.