Hide Forgot
Description of problem: I have made some minor modifications to the gamin .spec file to include inotify backend support. Credit goes to Robert Love for the patch. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.0.23-1 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: Patch gamin to add inotify backend support. Expected results: N/A Additional info: See attached patch and .spec file.
Created attachment 110946 [details] gamin.spec file
Created attachment 110947 [details] inotify's backend support for gamin
How does this relates to patches made by John McCutchan ? Like for example: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gamin-list/2005-February/msg00005.html What is the diff for the spec file ? There is a spec file in the gamin tarball. In general I don't think bugzilla is the right place for these discussions, the gamin mailing-list is. Daniel
I did not intend this to be a discussion, but a proposal for inclusion. The attached patch here is identical to the one posted in gamin-list by John McCutchan. I erroneously credited Robert Love for the patch instead of John McCutchan. Robert deserves credit for the kernel patch.
Created attachment 110960 [details] Diff for the .spec file
Already applied upstream, no diff needed for the spec file, this will be included in the next release, and I don't think keeping patches within source RPMs while they are integrated upstream and doesn't work for the current shipped kernel to be a good idea. All this really need to be done upstream, on the list, any other options is just a waste of time. Daniel