SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00585750-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00585750-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework-1.18.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: High-speed C++ MVC Framework for Web Application Fedora Account System Username: mosquito
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 1080 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/cheese/Public/1477834-treefrog-framework/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/include(filesystem) [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. Note: configure failed to run. Upstream configure script only accepts a subset of options that added by %configure [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in treefrog-framework-devel [!]: Package functions as described. Note: The tools should be built too. See INSTALL.md. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: treefrog-framework-1.18.0-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm treefrog-framework-devel-1.18.0-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm treefrog-framework-1.18.0-1.fc27.src.rpm treefrog-framework.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id treefrog-framework.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C Header files and libraries for building and developing apps with treefrog-framework. treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/include 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C Header files and libraries for building and developing apps with treefrog-framework. treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation treefrog-framework-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/include treefrog-framework.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtreefrog.so.1.18.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- treefrog-framework-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libtreefrog.so.1()(64bit) treefrog-framework(x86-64) treefrog-framework (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.9)(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Sql.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Sql.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Xml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmongoc-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- treefrog-framework-devel: treefrog-framework-devel treefrog-framework-devel(x86-64) treefrog-framework: libtreefrog.so.1()(64bit) treefrog-framework treefrog-framework(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/treefrogframework/treefrog-framework/archive/v1.18.0/treefrog-framework-1.18.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9d9c60c9b36a4a76ac89adcdf1bf3c9a7135f89774332087b34f27e8fc89e0ca CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9d9c60c9b36a4a76ac89adcdf1bf3c9a7135f89774332087b34f27e8fc89e0ca Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1477834 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00586588-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00586588-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework-1.18.0-2.fc25.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21039110 Build passed.
SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00586590-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00586590-treefrog-framework/treefrog-framework-1.18.0-2.fc26.src.rpm Build passed.
This package is approved by cheeselee.
This is already in Rawhide. Closing on behalf of the Deepin Desktop packaging effort.
Not really built in Rawhide.
Ah, sorry. There must be some issue with my bulk checking script.
Well, there is a package called treefrog-framework in distgit https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/treefrog-framework But yes, it has never been imported.
I believe that is a bug. Commented on the ticket https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45
Package never imported, are you still interested in getting it into Fedora repos?
Closing as DEADREVIEW Filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10336