Bug 147996 - augrep -s does not handle year roll correctly
Summary: augrep -s does not handle year roll correctly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: laus
Version: 3.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Vas Dias
QA Contact: Jay Turner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-02-14 16:45 UTC by Jin Mazumdar
Modified: 2015-01-08 00:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-20 03:25:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:219 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE laus bug fix update 2005-05-19 04:00:00 UTC

Description Jin Mazumdar 2005-02-14 16:45:37 UTC
Description of problem:

augrep -s <iso timestamp>

works correctly unless there are old records left from a previous
year and then it displays them.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

2.4.21-15.0.3.EL

How reproducible:

Everytime.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Somehow generate audit records from a previous year.  (May want to
make the month later than the current month.
2.  Do a augrep -s <date in iso format> with this years date.
3.
  
Actual results:

Gives results from previous years.

Expected results:

Should only have results from the date given and later

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jason Vas Dias 2005-02-24 18:02:39 UTC
This bug is now fixed in laus-0.1-67RHEL3, which should be in 
RHEL-3-U5, and which meanwhile can be downloaded from:
   http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/laus/

Comment 2 Dennis Gregorovic 2005-05-20 03:25:53 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-219.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.