Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1486143 - Add boothd ports to high-availability service
Add boothd ports to high-availability service
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firewalld (Show other bugs)
7.4
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Eric Garver
Tomas Dolezal
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-08-29 03:27 EDT by Ondrej Faměra
Modified: 2018-04-10 06:31 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: firewalld-0.4.4.4-14.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 06:30:16 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch for high-availability service (deleted)
2017-08-29 03:27 EDT, Ondrej Faměra
no flags Details | Diff


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2018:0702 None None None 2018-04-10 06:31 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Ondrej Faměra 2017-08-29 03:27:32 EDT
Description of problem:
Boothd ports are missing from 'high-availability' service. boothd daemon was added in RHEL 7.4.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firewalld-0.4.4.4-6.el7.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. firewall-cmd --add-service=high-availability

Actual results:
ports 9929/tcp and 9929/udp are not allowed on firewall

Expected results:
ports 9929/tcp and 9929/udp will be allowed on firewall so boothd daemon can communicate.

Additional info:
  # man booth
  ...
   port
     The UDP/TCP port to use. Default is 9929.
  ...

Simple patch for high-availability service attached.
Comment 2 John Ruemker 2017-08-29 12:56:38 EDT
I'm needinfoing Chris from the High Availability team here so he or someone from his team can confirm these are indeed additions that they would support us making - considering booth is an optional service that doesn't necessarily apply to every deployment.  Including it certainly will simplify things for many users, so I am not opposed.  But it opens a few ports that aren't always needed, so I'd like to make sure this decision has been fully weighed.
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 06:30:16 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0702

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.