Description of problem:
In the following document, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.5/architecture/core_concepts/routes.html#path-based-routes (and similarly 3.6), I would like to ask for clarification to be added with respect to path based routes targeting the path on the filesystem.

For example:
Two services, we'll call them 2016 and 2017, both point to a simple hello world application.

Route is created and exposed for the service 2017, "helloworld.mysite.com"
Route is created and exposed for the service 2016, "helloworld.mysite.com/2016"

Both routes have the same hostname, but with the documentation in mind they are taken by most specific to least specific, so if /2016 is targeted then we will be taken to the 2016 service.

Once this occurs, if the 2016 service helloworld application does not have a 2016/ directory, then we'll receive the "Not Found

The requested URL /2016/ was not found on this server."

Error message because the path does not exist. This has led to some confusion that I think could be fixed with a documentation change.

If the path-based route that is set up is expecting the path to be in the file system, adding documentation for this in the aforementioned documents.

If the path-based route that is set up should be taking it to the app source for the service, then instead this should be a bug ticket.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 3.5