Modulemd URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/autoconf.yaml Description: GNU's Autoconf is a tool for configuring source code and Makefiles. Using Autoconf, programmers can create portable and configurable packages, since the person building the package is allowed to specify various configuration options. You should install Autoconf if you are developing software and would like to create shell scripts that configure your source code packages. If you are installing Autoconf, you will also need to install the GNU m4 package. Note that the Autoconf package is not required for the end-user who may be configuring software with an Autoconf-generated script; Autoconf is only required for the generation of the scripts, not their use. This module has disabled support for Emacs. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar
$ yamllint autoconf.yaml autoconf.yaml 1:1 warning missing document start "---" (document-start) 23:18 error too many spaces inside brackets (brackets) 23:22 error too many spaces inside brackets (brackets)
After a second look, this module doesn't make much sense to me. autoconf belongs in the autotools module: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484409
(In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #2) > After a second look, this module doesn't make much sense to me. autoconf > belongs in the autotools module: What If I claim it does not? In my opinion Autoconf is independent from Automake or Libtool. And is it relevant? Are we going to dismiss modules just because the reviewer has no use for it?
(In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #1) > $ yamllint autoconf.yaml > autoconf.yaml > 1:1 warning missing document start "---" (document-start) > 23:18 error too many spaces inside brackets (brackets) > 23:22 error too many spaces inside brackets (brackets) What's wrong with it? module: [ MIT ] This is a completely valid flow sequence per YAML 1.2 specification <http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#style/flow/sequence>.
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3) > (In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #2) > > After a second look, this module doesn't make much sense to me. autoconf > > belongs in the autotools module: > > What If I claim it does not? Because automake needs autoconf at run-time, I can see the reason for having the two in one module. I'm curious what stream identifier you assign after abandoning the Fedora release numbering (f27). I guess Automake varsion will be there, but still it looks odd to me.
fedrepo-req requires a certain format for the bugzilla title. Fixing....
Autoconf package will be provided by autotools module (bug #1487508).