Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
OK, I kept getting the same errors every time pulp_database.repo_profile_applicability fired for four of the six content hosts I subscribed at the same time with an Ansible role. I cleaned them out of Satellite and then resubbed them, manually, with a few seconds between each one. No more duplicate keys. Disappointing that I had to do this. Hopefully this is one of the bugs that's fixed in 6.2.11.
Comment 2Tanya Tereshchenko
2017-09-11 20:43:15 UTC
Hi Ben,
You found the right BZ 1468022, it's the same issue: race condition for applicability tasks. It can happen in a few cases, including yours, when multiple content hosts are registered at the same time with the same set of packages installed on them. It is not fixed in 6.2.11, as far as I know.
In case of any other questions relevant to this issue, please, comment on BZ 1468022.
Thanks!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1468022 ***