RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1488110 - RHSCL-meta packages don't own %{_scl_root}/usr/lib64
Summary: RHSCL-meta packages don't own %{_scl_root}/usr/lib64
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1475718
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: scl-utils
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-09-04 11:04 UTC by Luboš Uhliarik
Modified: 2018-08-29 14:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-08-29 14:22:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Luboš Uhliarik 2017-09-04 11:04:16 UTC
Description of problem:
e.g. rh-nginx112-runtime package doesn't own /opt/rh/rh-nginx112/root/usr/lib64 directory on aarch42 and ppc64le architectures. 

The situation is the same in httpd24-runtime package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
*-runtime

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qlp rh-nginx112-runtime-1.12-3.el7.aarch64.rpm | grep 'usr/lib64$'
2. rpm -qlp rh-nginx112-runtime-1.12-3.el7.ppc64le.rpm | grep 'usr/lib64$'

Actual results:
nothing, /opt/rh/rh-nginx112/root/usr/lib64 is not included

Expected results:
/opt/rh/rh-nginx112/root/usr/lib64

Additional info:

This is part of the macros.scl:

%ifarch x86_64 ppc ppc64 sparc sparc64 s390 s390x
%{_scl_root}/%{_lib}
%endif

IMO, previous lines should be modified in this way (add aarch64 and ppc64le architecture):

%ifarch x86_64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le aarch64 sparc sparc64 s390 s390x
%{_scl_root}/%{_lib}
%endif

please, see this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487085

Comment 3 Joe Orton 2018-08-29 14:22:13 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1475718 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.