Bug 1489219 - Review Request: pop-icon-theme - System76 Pop icon theme for Linux
Summary: Review Request: pop-icon-theme - System76 Pop icon theme for Linux
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-09-07 01:16 UTC by Allisson Azevedo
Modified: 2020-08-02 18:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-02 18:38:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Allisson Azevedo 2017-09-07 01:16:40 UTC
Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/allisson/fedora-packages/raw/master/pop-icon-theme/pop-icon-theme.spec
SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/allisson/fedora-packages/raw/master/pop-icon-theme/pop-icon-theme-0.1.0-1.git38ecdfe.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Pop is a free and open source SVG icon theme for Linux, based on Paper Icon Set and Papirus.
Fedora Account System Username: allisson

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-07 11:51:15 UTC
Hello,

  - A git snapshot must include a commidtdate. And if it's a prerelease, the Release tag should start at 0.1

%global commitdate 20170831

  And:

Release:        0.1.%{commidate}git%{shortcommit0}%{?dist}

  Then:

* Wed Sep  6 2017 Allisson Azevedo <allisson> - 0.1.0-0.1.20170831git38ecdfe


 - The License should be: LGPLv3 and CC-BY-SA , as described in both LICENSE.cursors and LICENSE.icons

 - This is not needed in %install: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

 - You should use a simplified Source0, like this:

Source0:        https://github.com/system76/%{name}/archive/%{commit0}/%{name}-%{shortcommit0}.tar.gz



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GPL (v2)", "GPL (v3)", "CC by-sa (v4.0)", "Unknown or
     generated". 25685 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/pop-icon-theme/review-pop-
     icon-theme/licensecheck.txt
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in pop-icon-theme
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: pop-icon-theme-0.1.0-0.1.20170831git38ecdfe.fc28.noarch.rpm
          pop-icon-theme-0.1.0-0.1.20170831git38ecdfe.fc28.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-09 09:13:38 UTC
All good, 📦 accepted

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-09-11 14:11:14 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pop-icon-theme


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.