This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 149322 - CAN-2005-0490 Multiple stack based buffer overflows in curl
CAN-2005-0490 Multiple stack based buffer overflows in curl
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: curl (Show other bugs)
4.0
All Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ivana Varekova
impact=low,public=20050221,source=bug...
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-02-22 09:04 EST by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-05 11:06:48 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Josh Bressers 2005-02-22 09:04:47 EST
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in libcURL and cURL 7.12.1, and
possibly other versions, allow remote malicious web servers to execute
arbitrary code via base64 encoded replies that exceed the intended
buffer lengths when decoded, which is not properly handled by (1) the
Curl_input_ntlm function in http_ntlm.c during NTLM authentication or
(2) the Curl_krb_kauth and krb4_auth functions in krb4.c during
Kerberos authentication.

http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=203&type=vulnerabilities
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=202&type=vulnerabilities
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-02-22 09:05:54 EST
This issue should also affect RHEL2.1 and RHEL3.
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2005-04-05 11:06:48 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-340.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.