Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Description of problem: # dnf update Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:23 ago on Tue 26 Sep 2017 07:58:55 AM +05. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 and glibc-2.26-6.fc27.i686 - cannot install both glibc-2.26-6.fc27.i686 and glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-2.26-6.fc27.i686 Problem 2: package cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-34.fc27.i686 requires libcrypt.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed - libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - cannot install both libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 conflicts with libcrypt provided by libcrypt-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-2.26-6.fc27.i686 conflicts with libcrypt-nss provided by libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 and libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-34.fc27.i686 Problem 3: package cups-libs-1:2.2.4-4.fc27.i686 requires libcrypt.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 conflicts with libcrypt provided by libcrypt-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - libcrypt-2.26-6.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - glibc-2.26-6.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - package libcrypt-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both glibc-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package cups-libs-1:2.2.4-4.fc27.i686 Problem 4: problem with installed package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-6.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-2.26-6.fc27.i686 requires glibc-common = 2.26-6.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-common-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-common-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both glibc-common-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-common-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-common-2.26-6.fc27.x86_64 =============================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): glibc i686 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 4.6 M glibc x86_64 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 3.6 M glibc i686 2.26-8.fc27 updates-testing 4.6 M glibc x86_64 2.26-8.fc27 updates-testing 3.6 M glibc-common x86_64 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 872 k glibc-common x86_64 2.26-8.fc27 updates-testing 872 k libcrypt i686 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 72 k libcrypt i686 2.26-8.fc27 updates-testing 73 k libcrypt-nss x86_64 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 64 k libcrypt-nss x86_64 2.26-8.fc27 updates-testing 65 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: libcrypt x86_64 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 71 k libcrypt-nss i686 2.26-6.fc27 fedora 64 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Skip 12 Packages Nothing to do. Complete!
This is a problem with the compose: Installed Packages Name : libcrypt-nss Version : 2.26 Release : 8.fc27 Arch : x86_64 Size : 36 k Source : glibc-2.26-8.fc27.src.rpm Repo : @System From repo : updates-testing Summary : Password hashing library (NSS version) URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/glibc/ License : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ Description : This package provides the crypt function, which implements password : hashing. The cryptographic algorithm implementations are provided by : the low-level NSS libraries. Available Packages Name : libcrypt Version : 2.26 Release : 8.fc27 Arch : i686 Size : 73 k Source : glibc-2.26-8.fc27.src.rpm Repo : updates-testing Summary : Password hashing library (non-NSS version) URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/glibc/ License : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ Description : This package provides the crypt function, which implements password : hashing. The glibc implementation of the cryptographic algorithms is : used by this package. Name : libcrypt Version : 2.26 Release : 8.fc27 Arch : x86_64 Size : 72 k Source : glibc-2.26-8.fc27.src.rpm Repo : updates-testing Summary : Password hashing library (non-NSS version) URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/glibc/ License : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ Description : This package provides the crypt function, which implements password : hashing. The glibc implementation of the cryptographic algorithms is : used by this package. Name : libcrypt-nss Version : 2.26 Release : 6.fc27 Arch : i686 Size : 64 k Source : glibc-2.26-6.fc27.src.rpm Repo : fedora Summary : Password hashing library (NSS version) URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/glibc/ License : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ Description : This package provides the crypt function, which implements password : hashing. The cryptographic algorithm implementations are provided by : the low-level NSS libraries. libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 is missing. It was built and is available in Koji. I filed a releng issue: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071
We can't fix this releng issue on the glibc side.
again unable update glibc # dnf update Last metadata expiration check: 2:32:05 ago on Wed 18 Oct 2017 08:35:01 PM +05. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-2.26-14.fc27.i686 and glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - cannot install both glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 and glibc-2.26-14.fc27.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 Problem 2: package isdn4k-utils-3.27-8.fc27.i686 requires libcrypt.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed - libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - cannot install both libcrypt-nss-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 and libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 conflicts with libcrypt provided by libcrypt-2.26-14.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-2.26-8.fc27.i686 conflicts with libcrypt-nss provided by libcrypt-nss-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and libcrypt-nss-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package isdn4k-utils-3.27-8.fc27.i686 Problem 3: package cups-libs-1:2.2.4-6.fc27.i686 requires libcrypt.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 conflicts with libcrypt provided by libcrypt-2.26-14.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - libcrypt-2.26-8.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 has inferior architecture - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - package libcrypt-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both glibc-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package cups-libs-1:2.2.4-6.fc27.i686 Problem 4: problem with installed package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 - package libcrypt-nss-2.26-8.fc27.i686 requires glibc(x86-32) = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-2.26-8.fc27.i686 requires glibc-common = 2.26-8.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both glibc-common-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-common-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install both glibc-common-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 and glibc-common-2.26-14.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibc-common-2.26-8.fc27.x86_64 =============================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): glibc i686 2.26-14.fc27 updates-testing 4.6 M glibc x86_64 2.26-14.fc27 updates-testing 3.6 M glibc-common x86_64 2.26-14.fc27 updates-testing 843 k libcrypt i686 2.26-8.fc27 fedora 73 k libcrypt i686 2.26-14.fc27 updates-testing 44 k libcrypt-nss x86_64 2.26-14.fc27 updates-testing 36 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: libcrypt x86_64 2.26-8.fc27 fedora 72 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Skip 7 Packages Nothing to do. Complete!
This is a releng issue. Composes are currently broken. We cannot fix this with changes to the glibc package. I'm sorry.
maybe better reassign to appropriate component than close unfixed bug?
(In reply to Mikhail from comment #5) > maybe better reassign to appropriate component than close unfixed bug? See comment 1. I filed an issue in Pagure: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071 releng doesn't use Bugzilla anymore.