Description of problem: glusterblock-provisioner image name seems have changed recently (RC build) and hence needs to be updated in the glusterblock-provisioner.yaml template to avoid deployment failures. See below: ################### # docker pull registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-docker:3.3.0-15 Trying to pull repository registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-docker ... unknown: Not Found # docker search rhgs-gluster INDEX NAME DESCRIPTION STARS OFFICIAL AUTOMATED redhat.com registry.access.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-server-rhel7 containerized Red Hat Gluster Storage imag... 0 redhat.com registry.access.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7 Management Service Instance responsible fo... 0 redhat.com registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7 Containerized Gluster-block Provisioner im... 0 redhat.com registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-server-rhel7 containerized Red Hat Gluster Storage imag... 0 redhat.com registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7 Management Service Instance responsible fo... 0 # docker pull registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7:3.3.0-15 Trying to pull repository registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7 ... sha256:a677c048cf33c05d6dd102d94c1176fceafe3ed51741ab4b411f98d3a6211808: Pulling from registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7 e373541ccf6a: Already exists c5d2e9481169: Already exists fb279ddda867: Pull complete Digest: sha256:a677c048cf33c05d6dd102d94c1176fceafe3ed51741ab4b411f98d3a6211808 Status: Downloaded newer image for registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7:3.3.0-15 [root@ocp-node3 ~]# docker images REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7 3.3.0-15 d027a48a75a6 6 days ago 249.1 MB ################### Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cns-deploy-5.0.0-50.el7rhgs.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install packages from Stage and try to provision 2. 3. Actual results: gluster-block image name is wrong in the template Expected results: gluster-block image name needs to be updated Additional info: --------------- # grep -nri "image:" /usr/share/heketi/templates/ /usr/share/heketi/templates/deploy-heketi-template.yaml:67: image: rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7:3.3.0-21 /usr/share/heketi/templates/gluster-s3-template.yaml:64: image: rhgs3/rhgs-s3-server-rhel7:3.3.0-11 /usr/share/heketi/templates/glusterblock-provisioner.yaml:77: image: rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-docker:3.3.0-15 /usr/share/heketi/templates/glusterfs-template.yaml:36: - image: rhgs3/rhgs-server-rhel7:3.3.0-27 /usr/share/heketi/templates/heketi-template.yaml:67: image: rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7:3.3.0-21 ---------------
This was the image name until last build: brew-pulp-docker01.web.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com:8888/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-docker 3.3.0-14 9c4032be233f 8 days ago 249.1 MB
Fixed at version cns-deploy-5.0.0-51.el7rhgs
Verified as fixed in cns-deploy-5.0.0-51.el7rhgs.x86_64 ############### # grep -nri "image:" /usr/share/heketi/templates/* /usr/share/heketi/templates/deploy-heketi-template.yaml:67: image: rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7:3.3.0-21 /usr/share/heketi/templates/glusterblock-provisioner.yaml:77: image: rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7:3.3.0-16 /usr/share/heketi/templates/glusterfs-template.yaml:36: - image: rhgs3/rhgs-server-rhel7:3.3.0-27 /usr/share/heketi/templates/gluster-s3-template.yaml:64: image: rhgs3/rhgs-s3-server-rhel7:3.3.0-11 /usr/share/heketi/templates/heketi-template.yaml:67: image: rhgs3/rhgs-volmanager-rhel7:3.3.0-21 registry.access.stage.redhat.com/rhgs3/rhgs-gluster-block-prov-rhel7 3.3.0-16 858177e9e5f5 2 days ago 249.1 MB ###############
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:2881