Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1496254

Summary: [RFE] OpenStack Security Group at Domain and Multi-tenant level
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Pierre-Andre MOREY <pmorey>
Component: openstack-neutronAssignee: Assaf Muller <amuller>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Toni Freger <tfreger>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 13.0 (Queens)CC: amuller, chrisw, nyechiel, srevivo
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-02-14 15:05:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pierre-Andre MOREY 2017-09-26 19:21:56 UTC 
Description of problem:

Our customeran IT service provider. They provide multiple services; some of them are based on your products, and more specifically on RHOSP.

Therefore they have multiple tenants and are often creating quite the same security group for each of them respectively. If there is a change to do, they have to do it for all. A domain level security group would definitively help there.

They also have organization that want to manage their security groups for their tenants, and therefore a multi-tenant level security role with the possibility to describe security groups at this level would be useful too.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHOSP8, but soon RHOSP10 and as soon as possible RHOSP13 (which includes lot of features that are essential for them).

Actual results:
You need to create security groups per tenant, which cann be tedious, and some of them are redondants.

Expected results:
Create domain or multi-tenant security group that are duplicated/synchronized on below levels.

Regards,
Pierre-André
Comment 1 Assaf Muller 2017-09-27 19:37:07 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1401393 ***