Bug 149643 - elfutils-libelf-devel require to build from srpms.
Summary: elfutils-libelf-devel require to build from srpms.
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 155221
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: php   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Joe Orton
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-02-24 20:01 UTC by Remi COLLET
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-19 07:57:02 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Remi COLLET 2005-02-24 20:01:26 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20050113 Fedora/1.7.5-3

Description of problem:
I've try to build php-5.0.3-2 from rawhide on FC3.

There is no dependencies on "elfutils-libelf-devel" which is require
(configure failed in snmp test).

Installing it make the build possible, so i think a "BuildRequires:"
should be inserted for it in the spec file.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
php-5.0.3-2 (from rawhide)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -e elfutils-libelf-devel
2. rpmbuild --rebuild  php-5.0.3-2.src.rpm
    

Actual Results:  Configure failed.

Additional info:

yum install elfutils-libelf-devel
rpmbuild --rebuild  php-5.0.3-2.src.rpm

Success.
Comment 1 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2005-04-15 20:15:40 UTC 
I've seen plenty of CVS commits against PHP as of late (currently at
php-5.0.4-6), but none of them concerns this bug that would take about 15
seconds to fix. Any ETA at all?

Also, the version should be changed to devel since it's a Rawhide package that
has the bug.
Comment 2 Joe Orton 2005-04-19 07:57:02 UTC 
Because it's a net-snmp bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 155221 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.