Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1497839 - When Secrets are defined the APB Pod is not run in the transient namespace
When Secrets are defined the APB Pod is not run in the transient namespace
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Service Broker (Show other bugs)
3.7.0
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity low
: ---
: 3.7.0
Assigned To: Shawn Hurley
Jian Zhang
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-10-02 16:18 EDT by Shawn Hurley
Modified: 2017-11-28 17:14 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-28 17:14:33 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2017:3188 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.7 security, bug, and enhancement update 2017-11-28 21:34:54 EST

  None (edit)
Description Shawn Hurley 2017-10-02 16:18:27 EDT
Description of problem:
When secrets are defined to be used with an APB by the administrator, then the APB is not launched in the transient namespace

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set up broker with secrets defined for a APB
2. Provision that APB
3.

Actual results:
Runs APB pod in ansible-service-broker namespace

Expected results:
Should run APB in a transient namespace.

Additional info:
Comment 1 weiwei jiang 2017-10-11 22:43:27 EDT
Looks like this will fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496688 also.
Comment 2 Shawn Hurley 2017-10-16 08:42:26 EDT
Fixed with PR: https://github.com/openshift/ansible-service-broker/pull/473
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2017-11-28 17:14:33 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3188

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.