From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050224 Firefox/1.0.1 Fedora/1.0.1-1.3.1 Description of problem: When attempting to burn a CD, a warning is printed cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 but apparently the CD gets written. After ejecting it and mounting it successfully, attempting to verify it using tar cf /dev/zero /media/cdrom result in a slew of I/O errors like ... tar: /media/cdrecorder/Varie/refman.pdf: Read error at byte 0, reading 6656 bytes: Input/output error tar: /media/cdrecorder/Varie/servlet-2_3-fcs-spec.pdf: Read error at byte 0, reading 2048 bytes: Input/output error ... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cdrecord-2.01.1-5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an ISO image using "mkisofs -R -o cd.iso cd-dir" and get the tsize. 2. Attempt to burn it using cdrecord -dao dev=ATA:1,1,0 driveropts=burnfree tsize=183138 cd.iso or cdrecord dev=ATA:1,1,0 driveropts=burnfree cd.iso 3. Eject the CD, put it back in and mount it. 4. Attempt the following command tar cf /dev/zero /media/cdrom Actual Results: A slew of I/O errors on the console. Expected Results: No I/O Error. Additional info: Scanning the ATA bus reports: scsidev: 'ATA' devname: 'ATA' scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2 Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27 Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'. cdrecord: Warning: using inofficial libscg transport code version (schily - Red Hat-scsi-linux-sg.c-1.83-RH '@(#)scsi-linux-sg.c 1.83 04/05/20 Copyright 1997 J. Schilling'). scsibus1: 1,0,0 100) 'DVD-16X ' 'OEM316B ' '1.00' Removable CD-ROM 1,1,0 101) 'BTC ' 'BCE1610IM ' 'A.20' Removable CD-ROM 1,2,0 102) * 1,3,0 103) * 1,4,0 104) * 1,5,0 105) * 1,6,0 106) * 1,7,0 107) *
Could you try to burn with the newest update kernel and: # cdrecord -dao dev=/dev/cdwriter driveropts=burnfree cd.iso
Tried with the above command and kernel-2.6.10-1.766_FC3, the very same CD burned and verified OK. May I suggest that the output of -scanbus might include the above, since it is apparently critical and most documentation for cdrecord points to the output of -scanbus as the definitive answer ?
good point! I will do that and release an update
Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test release, reopen and change the version to match. Thank you!
Just tried it with Fedora Core 6: the scanbus option does not warn about the dev=/dev/something option. Furthermore, dev=help does not list it either.
Just tried it with Fedora 7: the scanbus option does not warn about the dev=/dev/something option. Furthermore, dev=help does not list it either and actually says that open through Unix device is not supported.
Just tried it with Fedora 8: the scanbus option does not warn about the dev=/dev/something option. Furthermore, dev=help does not list it either. What is the bugzilla component corresponding to wodim-1.1.6-6.fc8 ?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This is probably no longer relevant.