Bug 1499566 - [Geo-rep]: Directory renames are not synced in hybrid crawl
Summary: [Geo-rep]: Directory renames are not synced in hybrid crawl
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: geo-replication
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kotresh HR
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1582417
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-10-08 17:18 UTC by Kotresh HR
Modified: 2018-05-25 07:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-4.0.0
Clone Of:
: 1582417 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-15 11:18:57 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kotresh HR 2017-10-08 17:18:33 UTC
Description of problem:
Directory renames are not synced in hybrid crawl

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mainline

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Setup geo-replication
2. Set the change_detector to xsync
3. Create directory (dir1) on master and let it sync to slave
4. rename dir1 to dir2


Actual results:
dir2 would not be synced to slave. dir1 still exists on slave

Expected results:
dir1 should be renamed to dir2 on slave

Additional info:

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-10-08 17:20:43 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/18448 (geo-rep: Fix rename of directory in hybrid crawl) posted (#1) for review on master by Kotresh HR (khiremat)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-11-10 05:37:00 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/18448 committed in master by  

------------- geo-rep: Fix rename of directory in hybrid crawl

In hybrid crawl, renames and unlink can't be
synced but directory renames can be detected.
While syncing the directory on slave, if the
gfid already exists, it should be rename.
Hence if directory gfid already exists, rename
it.

Change-Id: Ibf9f99e76a3e02795a3c2befd8cac48a5c365bb6
BUG: 1499566
Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat>

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2018-03-15 11:18:57 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-4.0.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-4.0.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-March/000092.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.