RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1501821 - rpm -qi shows "https://fedorahosted.org/iptraf-ng/" which no longer exists.
Summary: rpm -qi shows "https://fedorahosted.org/iptraf-ng/" which no longer exists.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: iptraf-ng
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.6
Assignee: Phil Cameron
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-10-13 09:25 UTC by Keigo Noha
Modified: 2020-02-04 10:31 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-04 10:31:21 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 2 Phil Cameron 2018-01-22 15:01:07 UTC 
I am moving upstream to https://github.com/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng/
This is work in progress. 
Anticipated development workflow will be based on github workflow.
When upstream is setup the fedora and rhel rpm spec files will be changed to reference it.
Comment 3 Phil Cameron 2018-01-24 16:59:24 UTC 
Upstream is moved to https://github.com/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng/
iptraf-ng-1.1.4-16 has the fix.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2018-01-24 18:02:01 UTC 
iptraf-ng-1.1.4-16.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cfeb3ee15b
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2018-01-25 08:38:47 UTC 
iptraf-ng-1.1.4-16.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cfeb3ee15b
Comment 8 Phil Cameron 2018-05-01 13:38:40 UTC 
The fix is in 7.6 as a side effect of other fixes that went in.
Comment 11 Phil Cameron 2018-05-22 13:03:13 UTC 
Sushil, can we get this added to the approved bugs list? This change is in fedora. fedorahosted.org no longer exists and the iptraf-ng rpm claims that this is the upstream source, which it isn't. Upstream has been moved to https://github.com/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng and this change fixes the rpm specfile.

Reverting the change is fairly complicated since the name of the tarball has changed along with the corresponding build rules. It will also require a fresh round of testing of the other bugs that also changed the specfile.
Comment 12 sushil kulkarni 2018-05-23 19:49:46 UTC 
I am not sure if there is an approved bug list.. Tomas, what would you like us to do with this bug that has a fix already in.. Dan's suggestion (C#10) ok?

Thanks!
Sushil
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.