Bug 150327 - CAN-2005-0762 Buffer overflow in SGI parser
Summary: CAN-2005-0762 Buffer overflow in SGI parser
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ImageMagick
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Clasen
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard: impact=moderate,public=20040609,sourc...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-03-04 16:56 UTC by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-03-23 10:07:21 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed fix for this issue. (3.02 KB, patch)
2005-03-04 16:58 UTC, Josh Bressers 		no flags Details | Diff
Demo exploit for this issue. (383.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2005-03-04 16:59 UTC, Josh Bressers 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2005:070 0 moderate SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: ImageMagick security update 2005-03-23 05:00:00 UTC

Description Josh Bressers 2005-03-04 16:56:24 UTC 
A heap overflow when parsing SGI files with ImageMagick. AFAIK, SGI codec is one
of 'internal' codecs of IM and is enabled by default.

* fixed in 6.0.2
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-03-04 16:57:29 UTC 
This issue should also affect RHEL2.1
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2005-03-04 16:58:30 UTC 
Created attachment 111671 [details]
Proposed fix for this issue.
Comment 3 Josh Bressers 2005-03-04 16:59:02 UTC 
Created attachment 111672 [details]
Demo exploit for this issue.
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2005-03-17 21:40:33 UTC 
This is covered by RHSA-2005:070-09.
Comment 5 Mark J. Cox 2005-03-23 10:07:21 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.