Bug 1504512 - Review Request: classifier - Organize files in your current directory, by classifying them into folders of music, pdfs, images, etc.
Summary: Review Request: classifier - Organize files in your current directory, by cla...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-10-20 05:02 UTC by Omar Berroteran
Modified: 2021-10-02 00:45 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-10-02 00:45:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Omar Berroteran 2017-10-20 05:02:39 UTC
Spec URL: https://lkf.fedorapeople.org/classifier.spec
SRPM URL: https://lkf.fedorapeople.org/classifier-2.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Organize files in your current directory, by classifying them into folders of music, pdfs, images, etc.
Fedora Account System Username: lkf

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-10-22 16:31:59 UTC
Hello,

 - I don't think you should provide both python2 and python3 versions: this is a binary, not a library. Remove the subpackages and keep the main to compile with Python 3.

 - You mustn't include a license file if upstream hasn't provided one. What you could do is extract the LICENSE from the README:

sed -e '0,/^## The MIT License/d' README.md > LICENSE

 - Split your description to stay below 80 characters per line

 - You must add the version in the %changelog:

* Fri Sep 15 2017 Nadie LKF Omar Berroteran Silva <omarberroteranlkf> - 2.0-1

 - Use:

Source0:       https://github.com/bhrigu123/classifier/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 

 - You should probably report the failing tests upstream.

Comment 2 William Moreno 2018-03-16 19:54:35 UTC
Fedora review run fine with this package. will upload results soon.

Comment 3 Package Review 2021-04-25 00:45:32 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Package Review 2021-06-04 00:46:09 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.

Comment 5 Package Review 2021-10-02 00:45:51 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.