Bug 1507986 - Review Request: toxcore - Peer to peer instant messenger
Summary: Review Request: toxcore - Peer to peer instant messenger
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sandro Mani
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1508002
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-10-31 15:57 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2017-12-19 19:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-19 19:44:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
manisandro: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
licensecheck.txt (10.93 KB, text/plain)
2017-11-01 09:49 UTC, Sandro Mani
no flags Details

Description Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-10-31 15:57:23 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/1455b41/toxcore.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/tox/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00656446-toxcore/toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc28.src.rpm

Description: Tox is a peer to peer (serverless) instant messenger aimed at making 
security and privacy easy to obtain for regular users. It uses NaCl 
for its encryption and authentication.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22828842

Comment 1 Sandro Mani 2017-11-01 09:49:24 UTC
Created attachment 1346390 [details]
licensecheck.txt

INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} is usually only needed for qmake generated Makefiles and shouldn't be necessary here.

Some files are BSD licensed, see licensecheck.txt attached.

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-11-01 14:30:13 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/68026b4/toxcore.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/tox/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00656750-toxcore/toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc28.src.rpm

 - Fixed licenses
 - Removed INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}


Thank you for all the reviews!

Comment 3 Sandro Mani 2017-11-01 14:50:28 UTC
This also needs to be included in the license breakdown

ISC
---
c-toxcore-0.1.10/toxcore/crypto_core_mem.c


These don't seem to actually be used so I guess it's okay to leave them out.

MIT/X11 (BSD like)
------------------
c-toxcore-0.1.10/other/bootstrap_daemon/docker/get-nodes.py
c-toxcore-0.1.10/other/fun/bootstrap_node_info.py

Comment 5 Sandro Mani 2017-11-01 21:08:10 UTC
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/include/tox
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.

=> Please fix this on import by using
%{_includedir}/tox/
instead of
%{_includedir}/tox/*

Rest is good, approved. 


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GPL", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
     (BSD like)", "BSD (unspecified)", "ISC", "BSD (2 clause)", "FSF All
     Permissive". 142 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/include/tox
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/tox
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm
          toxcore-devel-0.1.10-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm
          toxcore-debuginfo-0.1.10-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm
          toxcore-debugsource-0.1.10-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm
          toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc28.src.rpm
toxcore.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tox -> Ox, Tex, Lox
toxcore.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serverless -> server less, server-less, nerveless
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tox -> Ox, Tex, Lox
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serverless -> server less, server-less, nerveless
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
toxcore-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
toxcore.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tox -> Ox, Tex, Lox
toxcore.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serverless -> server less, server-less, nerveless
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: toxcore-debuginfo-0.1.10-2.fc28.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tox -> Ox, Tex, Lox
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serverless -> server less, server-less, nerveless
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
toxcore-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
toxcore-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
toxcore-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
toxcore-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
toxcore.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Tox -> Ox, Tex, Lox
toxcore.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serverless -> server less, server-less, nerveless
toxcore.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxav.so.1.10.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxav.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libsodium.so.23
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxav.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxcore.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxdns.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxdns.so.1.10.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxdns.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libsodium.so.23
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxdns.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxencryptsave.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxencryptsave.so.1.10.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
toxcore.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtoxencryptsave.so.1.10.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 22 warnings.



Requires
--------
toxcore-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libtoxav.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxcore.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxdns.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxencryptsave.so.1()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(libtoxcore)
    toxcore(x86-64)

toxcore-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

toxcore-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

toxcore (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libopus.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    librt.so.1()(64bit)
    libsodium.so.23()(64bit)
    libtoxcore.so.1()(64bit)
    libvpx.so.4()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
toxcore-devel:
    pkgconfig(libtoxav)
    pkgconfig(libtoxcore)
    toxcore-devel
    toxcore-devel(x86-64)

toxcore-debugsource:
    toxcore-debugsource
    toxcore-debugsource(x86-64)

toxcore-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    toxcore-debuginfo
    toxcore-debuginfo(x86-64)

toxcore:
    libtoxav.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxcore.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxdns.so.1()(64bit)
    libtoxencryptsave.so.1()(64bit)
    toxcore
    toxcore(x86-64)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/archive/v0.1.10/toxcore-0.1.10.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7ec99c71a31e612ba458d708e05174afb2852cfbb4504ccb9456bd706fc27bd1
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7ec99c71a31e612ba458d708e05174afb2852cfbb4504ccb9456bd706fc27bd1


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1507986
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-11-06 14:36:03 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/toxcore

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-11-07 11:38:12 UTC
toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6d37ee9718

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-11-07 19:15:04 UTC
toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6d37ee9718

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-12-19 19:44:48 UTC
toxcore-0.1.10-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.