Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1508893

Summary: APB's complain about missing asb ansible module
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Jason Montleon <jmontleo>
Component: Service BrokerAssignee: Jason Montleon <jmontleo>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Zhang Cheng <chezhang>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.7.0CC: aos-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3.7.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
undefined
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-28 22:20:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jason Montleon 2017-11-02 13:07:08 UTC 
Description of problem:
When running tasks with downstream APB's it will fail complaining about a missing asb ansible module

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
v3.7.0 release 189

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure ASB to use downstream images
2. Try to provision an APB that relies on the module

Actual results:
Task fails

Expected results:
Task succeeds

Additional info:
ansible-asb-modules has never been built downstream. We need to get it build so it will be included on the image. Right now the container builds are just showing no package when running the yum command and moving on:

2017-11-01 07:09:20,745 - atomic_reactor.util - DEBUG - No package ansible-asb-modules available
Comment 3 Zhang Cheng 2017-11-03 08:26:31 UTC 
Verified with latest images. Thanks.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-11-28 22:20:57 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3188