RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1509396 - RFC 5246 non compliance with CertificateVerify fallback to SHA-1 [rhel-7]
Summary: RFC 5246 non compliance with CertificateVerify fallback to SHA-1 [rhel-7]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nss
Version: 7.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: alpha
: 7.5
Assignee: Daiki Ueno
QA Contact: Ondrej Moriš
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1644854 1718289
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-11-03 16:58 UTC by Hubert Kario
Modified: 2019-08-06 13:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: nss-3.43.0-2.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1644854 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-08-06 13:08:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Mozilla Foundation 1412829 0 P3 RESOLVED RFC 5246 non compliance with CertificateVerify fallback to SHA-1 (NSS client should abort connection if no overlap) 2020-03-10 13:10:39 UTC
Mozilla Foundation 1552190 0 -- RESOLVED Wrong alert sent on receiving malformed Certificate Request 2020-03-10 13:10:40 UTC
Mozilla Foundation 1552208 0 None None None 2020-03-10 13:10:39 UTC
Mozilla Foundation 1552254 0 P3 NEW internal_error alert on Certificate Request with sha1+ecdsa in TLS 1.3 2020-03-10 13:10:39 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2019:2237 0 None None None 2019-08-06 13:08:53 UTC

Internal Links: 1718289

Description Hubert Kario 2017-11-03 16:58:51 UTC
Description of problem:
When NSS client does not recognise hashes in Certificate Request (e.g. when they are MD5 only) it signs the Certificate Verify with SHA-1.

This is non compliance with a RFC 5246 MUST clause:
      The hash and signature algorithms used in the signature MUST be
      one of those present in the supported_signature_algorithms field
      of the CertificateRequest message.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nss-3.34.0-0.1.beta1.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. setup server asking for just md-5 in Certificate Request
2. connect to it with NSS

Actual results:
server side:
Generated alert: decryption_failed: Invalid signature on Certificate Verify

client side:
tstclnt: read from socket failed: SSL_ERROR_DECRYPTION_FAILED_ALERT: Peer was unable to decrypt an SSL record it received.

Expected results:
early connection abort with handshake_failure

Additional info:
This is a regression compared to nss-3.28.4-8.el7.x86_64 that version was behaving correctly.

Comment 4 Simo Sorce 2019-02-11 15:39:53 UTC
This issue was not selected to be included either in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 because it is seen either as low or moderate impact to a small amount of use-cases. The next release will be in Maintenance Support 1 Phase, which means that qualified Critical and Important Security errata advisories (RHSAs) and Urgent Priority Bug Fix errata advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available. We will now close this issue, but if you believe that it qualifies for the Maintenance Support 1 Phase, please re-open; otherwise we recommend moving the request to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 if applicable.

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2019-08-06 13:08:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2237


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.