Bug 1510413 - AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x613000000040
Summary: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x613...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gdb
Version: 34
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Buettner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-11-07 11:06 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2021-05-02 13:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-02 13:35:54 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Milan Crha 2017-11-07 11:06:09 UTC
Trying to run gdb with AddressSanitizer leads to an abort with an alloc/dealloc mismatch reported. This is reproducible both in rawhide (gdb-8.0.1-30.fc28.x86_64) and in Fedora 26 (gdb-8.0.1-26.fc26.x86_64).

Steps:
a) install libasan
b) in terminal:
   $ export ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=1
   $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.4 gdb

Result:

=================================================================
==15496==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x613000000040
    #0 0x7f2a0f2bffd0 in operator delete(void*) (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.4+0xe0fd0)
    #1 0x56437b484f52  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x1c0f52)
    #2 0x56437b71d87e  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x45987e)
    #3 0x56437b6f00d4  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x42c0d4)
    #4 0x56437b66634f  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x3a234f)
    #5 0x56437b3d0bca  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x10cbca)
    #6 0x7f2a0bcf0106 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21106)
    #7 0x56437b3d2cf9  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x10ecf9)

0x613000000040 is located 0 bytes inside of 334-byte region [0x613000000040,0x61300000018e)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7f2a0f2bd850 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.4+0xde850)
    #1 0x56437b675840 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x3b1840)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.4+0xe0fd0) in operator delete(void*)
==15496==HINT: if you don't care about these errors you may set ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0
==15496==ABORTING

Comment 1 Jan Kratochvil 2017-11-07 11:34:08 UTC
GDB just isn't ASAN compatible, there are many bugs regarding that.  I was posting some ASAN-compatibility patches in the past upstream (but they did not get accepted).

Comment 2 Milan Crha 2017-11-07 13:43:55 UTC
Okay, it's just a pain if I want to run my application under ASAN and I want to run it under gdb at the same time, which is not possible without turning off one feature of ASAN. My usual ASAN options are rich:

   ASAN_OPTIONS=abort_on_error=1:detect_stack_use_after_return=0:detect_leaks=0:
   handle_segv=0:check_printf=0:detect_deadlocks=1:replace_str=1:
   replace_intrin=1:alloc_dealloc_mismatch=1:new_delete_type_mismatch=1:
   detect_container_overflow=1:symbolize=1

Comment 3 Milan Crha 2017-11-07 13:44:45 UTC
I forgot to add: feel free to close this, especially if upstream doesn't care.

Comment 4 Jan Kratochvil 2017-11-07 14:09:08 UTC
(In reply to Milan Crha from comment #2)
> Okay, it's just a pain if I want to run my application under ASAN and I want
> to run it under gdb at the same time, which is not possible without turning
> off one feature of ASAN.

I do not understand this.  Are you aware you can use:
(gdb) set env LD_PRELOAD=...
(gdb) set env ASAN_OPTIONS=...
which do apply to the debuggee but not to GDB?

Comment 5 Milan Crha 2017-11-08 19:00:42 UTC
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #4)
> Are you aware you can use: ...

Nope, I'm not. Imagine my workflow, please:

a) I have a script which sets environment variables as needed, including ASAN
   things
b) I run the script when I open a terminal
c) I do changes in my code and run the updated executable
d) when it crashes, I want to debug in gdb, sometimes, but I cannot do it in
   the same terminal.

It makes it inconvenient. Your suggested gdb commands can workaround the issue with not being able to run gdb under ASAN. Thanks.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 08:15:25 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '26'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 7 Jan Kratochvil 2018-05-03 08:33:26 UTC
gdb-8.1-14.fc29.x86_64
libasan-8.0.1-0.23.fc29.x86_64

ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5 gdb
=================================================================
==3458440==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x6020000000d0
    #0 0x7f8420830788 in operator delete(void*) (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xf1788)
    #1 0x5573f943d6e7  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x2896e7)
    #2 0x5573f943d5c8  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x2895c8)
    #3 0x5573f943cf68  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x288f68)
    #4 0x5573f956e770  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x3ba770)
    #5 0x5573f92e81de  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x1341de)
    #6 0x7f841d5921ea in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x231ea)
    #7 0x5573f92eada9  (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x136da9)

0x6020000000d0 is located 0 bytes inside of 4-byte region [0x6020000000d0,0x6020000000d4)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7f842082dc88 in malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xeec88)
    #1 0x5573f943e614 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x28a614)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xf1788) in operator delete(void*)
==3458440==HINT: if you don't care about these errors you may set ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0
==3458440==ABORTING

Comment 8 Jan Kurik 2018-08-14 10:17:09 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle.
Changing version to '29'.

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2019-10-31 19:58:32 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '29'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 10 Jan Kratochvil 2019-11-01 13:45:37 UTC
gdb-9.0.50.20191018-1.fc32.x86_64

ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5 gdb
=================================================================
==13069==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete []) on 0x602000000050
    #0 0x7fb6680beb3f in operator delete[](void*) (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x110b3f)
    #1 0x7fb667674577 in std::__cxx11::collate<char>::do_transform(char const*, char const*) const (/lib64/libstdc++.so.6+0xf5577)
    #2 0x7fb66703285c in boost::re_detail_106900::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform[abi:cxx11](char const*, char const*) const (/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.69.0+0x6985c)
    #3 0x7fb667033318  (/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.69.0+0x6a318)
    #4 0x7fb66703775e in boost::re_detail_106900::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::init() (/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.69.0+0x6e75e)
    #5 0x7fb667037fe1  (/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.69.0+0x6efe1)
    #6 0x7fb66704215b in boost::basic_regex<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > >::do_assign(char const*, char const*, unsigned int) (/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.69.0+0x7915b)
    #7 0x7fb6677b6e53  (/lib64/libsource-highlight.so.4+0x3de53)
    #8 0x7fb6689f2dc9 in call_init.part.0 (/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x10dc9)
    #9 0x7fb6689f2ed0 in _dl_init (/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x10ed0)
    #10 0x7fb6689e4149  (/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x2149)

0x602000000050 is located 0 bytes inside of 2-byte region [0x602000000050,0x602000000052)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7fb6680bbc58 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x10dc58)
    #1 0x561d7e59258e in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/libexec/gdb+0x2fd58e)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.5+0x110b3f) in operator delete[](void*)
==13069==HINT: if you don't care about these errors you may set ASAN_OPTIONS=alloc_dealloc_mismatch=0
==13069==ABORTING

Comment 11 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 15:45:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 12 Fedora Program Management 2021-04-29 15:53:40 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '32'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 13 Jan Kratochvil 2021-05-02 13:35:54 UTC
[patch] Fix LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so.6 gdb
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-May/178413.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.