Description of problem: armhfp install fails due to missing 'syslinux-extlinux' Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-Modular-27-20171105.n.3
Looks like something we probably need in the 'host' module.
Proposing as a blocker for Server Beta, extlinux-bootloader is needed for installation on armhfp. extlinux-bootloader-1.2-3.fc27 was included for the F27 'Classic' Beta
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/ReleaseBlocking#Modular_Server doesn't list the armhfp media as blocking, so I'm -1 blocker but +1 FE, since it prevents installation on an entire arch.
syslinux-extlinux is archful and only exists on i686 & x86_64. Should it exist on armhfp? Perhaps the package maintainer could advise.
Note that extlinux-bootloader and syslinux-extlinux are two different packages, both binary and source. extlinux-bootloader is really missing from Host. It can / should be added but I'm unsure about we should do about syslinux-extlinux on armhfp.
Okay, so it turns out extlinux-bootloader virtual-provides syslinux-extlinux. I'll add that package to Host.
Agreed, -1 blocker, +1 FE. Server has never had ARM as a release-blocking arch, for a reasonable reason: there's very little 32-bit ARM hardware that's appropriate for Server use.
Fixed in host:f27:20171107172526. https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/441
-1 blocker, +1 FE due to non-blocking arch for server, would be good to have, though.
+1 FE
That's enough votes to declare RejectedBlocker, AcceptedFreezeException.
This is fixed, pending a successful compose. I'll move it to ON_QA at that point for verification.
Should be fixed in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-Modular-27-20171108.0/compose/Server/armhfp/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-armhfp-27_Beta-1.3.iso Please test and confirm.
Fixed with Fedora-Modular-27-20171108.0 compose, install on armhfp now succeeds.