Bug 1512126 - [RFE] Ability to set which IFACE will be used for macvlan of egress router.
Summary: [RFE] Ability to set which IFACE will be used for macvlan of egress router.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RFE
Version: 3.6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Eric Paris
QA Contact: Xiaoli Tian
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-11-10 22:32 UTC by Ryan Howe
Modified: 2021-03-11 16:15 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-12 11:56:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1513768 0 medium CLOSED [3.6] Allow egress router to run on non-default interface 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Description Ryan Howe 2017-11-10 22:32:15 UTC
Description of problem:

At this time mavlan for the egress router is only attached to the default iface. 

https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-3.6/pkg/sdn/plugin/pod_linux.go#L85
https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-3.7/pkg/network/node/pod.go#L379


This RFE is to request the ability to define which iface will be used for the macvlan to attach too when the egress router is scheduled to a node.

Comment 2 Marcos Garcia 2017-11-17 14:29:52 UTC
Customer's version



OpenShift Master:

v3.6.173.0.21

Kubernetes Master:

v1.6.1+5115d708d7

Comment 3 Marcos Garcia 2017-11-17 14:35:31 UTC
As a reminder, Dan Winship suggested re-using the existing decorator

    pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true"

and accept further values like

    pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "eth1"

or in our case, which will be a bonded vlan device (bond1.558)

For more info on the egress router pod macvlan feature, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/admin_guide/managing_pods.html#admin-guide-deploying-an-egress-router-pod

Comment 5 Kirsten Newcomer 2019-06-12 11:56:58 UTC
With the introduction of OpenShift 4, Red Hat has delivered or roadmapped a substantial number of features based on feedback by our customers.  Many of the enhancements encompass specific RFEs which have been requested, or deliver a comparable solution to a customer problem, rendering an RFE redundant.

This bz (RFE) has been identified as a feature request not yet planned or scheduled for an OpenShift release and is being closed. 

If this feature is still an active request that needs to be tracked, Red Hat Support can assist in filing a request in the new JIRA RFE system, as well as provide you with updates as the RFE progress within our planning processes. Please open a new support case: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/new 

Opening a New Support Case: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/new 

As the new Jira RFE system is not yet public, Red Hat Support can help answer your questions about your RFEs via the same support case system.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.