We'll need this patch series in F27, once it is acked: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-November/msg00617.html
The series was pushed: 28907b0043 qemu: command: Mark <shared/> disks as such in qemu 860a3c4bea qemu: caps: Add capability for 'share-rw' disk option 2b41c86294 qemu: Disallow pivot of shared disks to unsupported storage 9b2fbfa6f6 qemu: snapshot: Disallow snapshot of unsupported shared disks 3b03a27cd0 qemu: domain: Reject shared disk access if backing format does not support it 1fc3cd8731 qemu: block: Add function to check if storage source allows concurrent access 85b0e2f126 qemu: domain: Refactor domain device validation function ab948b6299 qemu: domain: Move video device validation into separate function a6936ec098 qemu: domain: Move hostdev validation into separate function 577ccd07c3 qemu: domain: Despaghettify qemuDomainDeviceDefValidate 8ffdeed455 qemu: Move snapshot disk validation functions into one
Any idea when the patch will be approximately released for F27?
(In reply to bialekr from comment #3) > Any idea when the patch will be approximately released for F27? I will do a build this week
libvirt-3.7.0-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b16cdbdc34
libvirt-3.7.0-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b16cdbdc34
libvirt-3.7.0-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
*** Bug 1529035 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
My bug 1529035 was marked as a duplicate of this, but I have libvirt-3.7.0-3.fc27 on my system and still have a problem with guestmount --ro no longer working in fedora 27 on a live VMs disk image (more details in bug 1529035). Is this really the same as my bug?
Tom, if you're still hitting issues, please reopen your old bug or file a new one