Bug 1513626
| Summary: | [RFE] Allow client requests to preempt scrub | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
| Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Josh Durgin <jdurgin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Parikshith <pbyregow> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | Bara Ancincova <bancinco> |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 2.3 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, hgurav, hnallurv, jdurgin, kchai, kdreyer, mhackett, pbyregow, tserlin |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | 3.2 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-12.2.8-3.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.8-3redhat1 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.New option: `osd_scrub_max_preemptions`
With this release a new `osd_scrub_max_preemptions` option has been added. This option sets the maximum number of times Ceph preempts a deep scrub due to a client operation before blocking the client I/O to complete the scrubbing process. The option is set to 5 by default.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-01-03 19:01:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1629656 | ||
|
Comment 12
Vikhyat Umrao
2018-01-19 22:04:01 UTC
Luminous backport tracker - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22769 Luminous backport PR - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20033 maybe it will land in 12.2.4 This will be in 12.2.6 upstream included in 12.2.6 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0020 |