Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1516634

Summary: OSP11 -> OSP12 upgrade SRIOV Composable role failed
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Eran Kuris <ekuris>
Component: openstack-tripleoAssignee: Lukas Bezdicka <lbezdick>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Arik Chernetsky <achernet>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 12.0 (Pike)CC: ekuris, jlibosva, lbezdick, mandreou, mburns, mcornea, oblaut, rhel-osp-director-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-29 12:06:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1507225, 1516275    
Bug Blocks: 1516952    
Attachments:
Description Flags
logs & config from undercloud none

Description Eran Kuris 2017-11-23 07:08:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1358034 [details]
logs & config from undercloud

Description of problem:
Failed during upgrade from OSP11 SRIOV - Composable role setup to latest OSP12
vercloud.AllNodesDeploySteps.AllNodesPostUpgradeSteps.ControllerDeployment_Step3.0:
  resource_type: OS::Heat::StructuredDeployment
  physical_resource_id: 52cefde5-d2a4-4c31-a12b-ec2af27228bb
  status: CREATE_FAILED
  status_reason: |
    Error: resources[0]: Deployment to server failed: deploy_status_code : Deployment exited with non-zero status code: 2
  deploy_stdout: |

    PLAY [localhost] ***************************************************************

    TASK [Gathering Facts] *********************************************************
    ok: [localhost]

    TASK [Set host puppet debugging fact string] ***********************************
    ok: [localhost]

    TASK [Write the config_step hieradata] *****************************************
    changed: [localhost]

    TASK [Run puppet host configuration for step 3] ********************************
    ok: [localhost]

    TASK [debug] *******************************************************************
    fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {
        "(outputs.stderr|default('')).split('\n')|union(outputs.stdout_lines|default([]))": [
            "exception: connect failed",
            "Warning: Undefined variable 'deploy_config_name'; ",
            "   (file & line not available)",
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm -qa |grep triple
openstack-tripleo-validations-7.4.2-1.el7ost.noarch
python-tripleoclient-7.3.3-4.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-image-elements-7.0.1-1.el7ost.noarch
puppet-tripleo-7.4.3-7.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-common-containers-7.6.3-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-common-7.6.3-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-ui-7.4.3-4.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements-7.0.1-1.el7ost.noarch
openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-7.0.3-10.el7ost.noarch


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Deploy OSP-11 sriov with Composable role 
2.Run upgrade to osp12 use this guide: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/mcornea/OSP11-OSP12-Upgrade/blob/master/README.md
3.

Actual results:
failed 

Expected results:


Additional info:
Logs attached
Comment 1 Eran Kuris 2017-11-23 09:44:38 UTC 
The failure related to those bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1516275
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507225
Comment 2 Marius Cornea 2017-11-23 10:55:15 UTC 
I checked the environment and the failure was caused by the overcloud nodes not being able to reach the undercloud Docker registry. This was caused by the undercloud missing allowing firewall access for port tcp 8787 which looks pretty much similar to bug 1507225 except that 1507225 was reported for a different port.
Comment 3 Lukas Bezdicka 2017-11-23 14:37:30 UTC 
So this is most likely duplicate, can you confirm?
Comment 4 Eran Kuris 2017-11-23 15:04:33 UTC 
(In reply to Lukas Bezdicka from comment #3)
> So this is most likely duplicate, can you confirm?

Yes.
Comment 5 Jakub Libosvar 2017-11-29 12:06:54 UTC 
Closing as per comment 4

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1507225 ***