Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1519706 - [3.6.1 REF]Shouldn't show .operations index in non-ops kibana
[3.6.1 REF]Shouldn't show .operations index in non-ops kibana
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Logging (Show other bugs)
3.6.1
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: 3.6.z
Assigned To: Jeff Cantrill
Junqi Zhao
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-12-01 04:06 EST by Anping Li
Modified: 2018-01-23 12:59 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: Don't display an '.operations' index-mapping in a non-ops ES cluster Reason: Operations indices will never exist in a non-ops ES cluster Result: The index-mapping is no longer visible.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1519709 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-23 12:59:00 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
enabled ops cluster,kibana UI, there is not .operations index in non-ops kibana UI (222.14 KB, image/png)
2017-12-17 21:43 EST, Junqi Zhao
no flags Details


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift/origin-aggregated-logging/pull/844 None None None 2017-12-12 09:59 EST
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0113 normal SHIPPED_LIVE OpenShift Container Platform 3.7 and 3.6 bug fix and enhancement update 2018-01-23 17:55:59 EST

  None (edit)
Description Anping Li 2017-12-01 04:06:59 EST
Description of problem:
When ops is enabled, there is still a .operations index in non-ops kibana, when we click the .operations index, the kibana was tring to search records. that is wrong. We should use ops kibana to view operation logs.  the .operations index should be deleted in non-ops elasticsearch and kibana

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
logging-elasticsearch/images/v3.6.173.0.63-12
logging-elasticsearch/images/v3.6.173.0.63-12
logging-auth-proxy/images/v3.6.173.0.63-11
logging-fluentd/images/v3.6.173.0.63-11

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Deploy logging and enable ops elasticsearch

openshift_logging_install_logging=true
openshift_logging_image_prefix=registry.example.com/openshift3/
openshift_logging_namespace=logging
openshift_logging_es_cluster_size=1
openshift_logging_es_memory_limit=1Gi

openshift_logging_use_ops=true
openshift_logging_es_ops_memory_limit=1Gi
openshift_logging_es_ops_cluster_size=1


openshift_logging_use_mux=true
openshift_logging_use_mux_client=true




2. cluster-admin search records in non-ops kibana

Actual results:
There is a .operations index.

Expected results:
There isn't .operations index.


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeff Cantrill 2017-12-08 14:31:02 EST
This should be resolved when https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519705 is resolved.
Comment 3 Junqi Zhao 2017-12-17 21:43:02 EST
Enabled ops cluster, .operations index is not shown in non-ops kibana UI

Images:
logging-kibana/images/v3.6.173.0.89-1
logging-elasticsearch/images/v3.6.173.0.89-1
logging-fluentd/images/v3.6.173.0.89-1
logging-auth-proxy/images/v3.6.173.0.89-1
logging-curator/images/v3.6.173.0.89-1

elasticsearch-plugin in logging-elasticsearch image is openshift-elasticsearch-plugin-2.4.4.20 now
bash-4.2$ rpm -qa | grep elasticsearch-plugin
openshift-elasticsearch-plugin-2.4.4.20__redhat_1-1.el7.noarch
Comment 4 Junqi Zhao 2017-12-17 21:43 EST
Created attachment 1369250 [details]
enabled ops cluster,kibana UI, there is not .operations index in non-ops kibana UI
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2018-01-23 12:59:00 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0113

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.