Bug 1520245 - High mem/cpu usage, brick processes not starting and ssl encryption issues while testing scaling with multiplexing (500-800 vols)
Summary: High mem/cpu usage, brick processes not starting and ssl encryption issues wh...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: core
Version: mainline
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mohit Agrawal
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1517987
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-12-04 06:23 UTC by Mohit Agrawal
Modified: 2018-03-15 11:22 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-4.0.0
Clone Of: 1517987
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-15 11:22:12 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-12-04 06:52:21 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/18915 (core: glusterd is consuming high memory during volume provisioning) posted (#1) for review on master by MOHIT AGRAWAL

Comment 2 Kaushal 2017-12-04 10:42:38 UTC
Bug summary:

User experienced high resource usage when testing brick multiplexing with a large number of volumes. This in the end lead to issues with bricks not starting, and inconsistent states.

Possibly being caused due to some inefficiencies in graph load code.

Comment 3 Worker Ant 2017-12-12 12:08:57 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/18915 committed in master by \"MOHIT AGRAWAL\" <moagrawa> with a commit message- glusterd : Fix glusterd mem leaks

Problem:   glusterd eats a huge amount of meory during volume set/stop/start.

Solution:  At the time of compare graph topology create a graph and populate
           key values in the dictionary, after finished graph comparison we
           do destroy the new graph.At the time of construct graph we don't take
           any reference and for server xlators we do take reference in
           server_setvolume so in glusterd we do take reference after prepare
           a new graph while we do create a graph to compare graph topology.

BUG: 1520245
Change-Id: I573133d57771b7dc431a04422c5001a06b7dda9a
Signed-off-by: Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa>

Comment 4 Shyamsundar 2018-03-15 11:22:12 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-4.0.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-4.0.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-March/000092.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.