Bug 1520584 - Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP - NetAddr::IP related types and coercions for Moose
Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP - NetAddr::IP related types and ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Oliver
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-12-04 18:57 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2018-03-06 17:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 17:30:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mavit: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 2 Peter Oliver 2017-12-05 17:39:02 UTC
The packaging guidelines say that you SHOULD ask upstream to include the text of the licences in its own file.  Also, it would be better to use https:// rather than http:// for Source0.  Other than that, it all looks good to me.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/mavit/src/fedora/1520584-perl-MooseX-
     Types-NetAddr-IP/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.   Didn’t try, but tests passed.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.  Didn’t test, but matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP+0.07 looks favourable.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc28.noarch.rpm
          perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc28.src.rpm
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) coercions -> coercion, coercion's, coercion s
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) coercions -> coercion, coercion's, coercion s
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) coercions -> coercion, coercion's, coercion s
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.



Requires
--------
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.1)
    perl(Module::Runtime)
    perl(MooseX::Types)
    perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
    perl(namespace::clean)
    perl(strict)
    perl(warnings)



Provides
--------
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP:
    perl(MooseX::Types::NetAddr::IP)
    perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP



Source checksums
----------------
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TC/TCAINE/MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4df5a5d1ce8346dd1f92c0f0bc38ac7383a1b2dd8977fa9e708340e72e027a88
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4df5a5d1ce8346dd1f92c0f0bc38ac7383a1b2dd8977fa9e708340e72e027a88


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1520584
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-12-07 13:57:12 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP. You may commit to the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2017-12-08 10:58:40 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e239663377

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2017-12-08 11:24:05 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b820957df0

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-12-09 07:28:40 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b820957df0

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-12-10 00:33:08 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e239663377

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-12-19 19:47:25 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2017-12-19 21:34:49 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2018-02-09 21:29:08 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fc7101641

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2018-02-13 08:55:28 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fc7101641

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2018-03-06 17:30:11 UTC
perl-MooseX-Types-NetAddr-IP-0.07-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.