RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Related --in-place info should be removed from http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v.1.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
virt-v2v-1.36.10-4.el7.x86_64
libguestfs-1.36.10-4.el7.x86_64


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v.1.html
2.Found related --in-place info in virt-v2v web.

Actual results:
As above description

Expected results:
Related --in-place info should be removed from http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v.1.html

Additional info:

Actually I'm confused now.  The web site has the upstream copy of
the virt-v2v man page, and it definitely should mention --in-place
which is an upstream feature.

I thought you meant that the RHEL man page virt-v2v(1) still contains
references to --in-place?

(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #2)
> Actually I'm confused now.  The web site has the upstream copy of
> the virt-v2v man page, and it definitely should mention --in-place
> which is an upstream feature.
> 
> I thought you meant that the RHEL man page virt-v2v(1) still contains
> references to --in-place?

Sorry,I forget web site is the upstream copy of the virt-v2v man page, pls help to close this bug,thanks

Closing per comment 3.