Created attachment 1372159 [details] screenshot of the window Description of problem: When adding new infrastructure provider, there's a message at the bottom of the window: "Required. Should have privileged access, such as root or administrator.". This message should be colored in red, and needs to reposition near the username field. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.9.0.12.20171205180333_3e32b3d How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Compute-->Infrastructure-->Providers-->Configuration-->Add new infrastructure provider. 2. Select provider type: "Red Hat Virtualization" Actual results: Message position and color is not as expected. Expected results: See description. Additional info: See attached screenshot.
New commits detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/90a8e7aa6b6698dc36b1bfdc16ad92e905aa7db5 commit 90a8e7aa6b6698dc36b1bfdc16ad92e905aa7db5 Author: Martin Hradil <mhradil> AuthorDate: Mon Jan 28 11:03:28 2019 -0500 Commit: Martin Hradil <mhradil> CommitDate: Mon Jan 28 11:03:28 2019 -0500 Move "Should have privileged access" message under the userid field and removed the "Required" bit, since the field already has a separate required error message when required and missing. The previous logic was written wrong, the condition was interpreted in ruby, not javascript, except for the last string. Thus this only checked emstype != azure_stack, as opposed to the whole condition listed. Fixed and moved into a function. (The limit to default tab comes from these messages being explicitly part of the default tab html.) Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528984 app/assets/javascripts/controllers/ems_common/ems_common_form_controller.js | 20 + app/views/layouts/angular-bootstrap/_auth_credentials_angular_bootstrap.html.haml | 2 + app/views/layouts/angular/_multi_auth_credentials.html.haml | 3 - 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/8d06e8bc8a5e453a3e8a5d71262be80c70233e0b commit 8d06e8bc8a5e453a3e8a5d71262be80c70233e0b Author: Martin Hradil <mhradil> AuthorDate: Thu Jul 25 08:34:39 2019 -0400 Commit: Martin Hradil <mhradil> CommitDate: Thu Jul 25 08:34:39 2019 -0400 AuthCredentials - move user should have privieged access message under the user field as opposed to outside the template https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528984 app/assets/javascripts/components/auth-credentials.js | 1 + app/views/configuration_manager/_shared_form.html.haml | 2 +- app/views/static/auth-credentials.html.haml | 2 + 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/ivanchuk: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/commit/492d0a81e6a98b4db0d9486b2ef171ee6c405698 commit 492d0a81e6a98b4db0d9486b2ef171ee6c405698 Author: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec> AuthorDate: Mon Aug 5 06:50:31 2019 -0400 Commit: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec> CommitDate: Mon Aug 5 06:50:31 2019 -0400 Merge pull request #5207 from himdel/multi-auth Provider edit - move message about a username near the field, fix everything (cherry picked from commit 5a944f82158cd9a028a0187bca2d1e9265fdb213) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528984 app/assets/javascripts/components/auth-credentials.js | 1 + app/assets/javascripts/controllers/ems_common/ems_common_form_controller.js | 20 + app/views/configuration_manager/_shared_form.html.haml | 2 +- app/views/layouts/angular-bootstrap/_auth_credentials_angular_bootstrap.html.haml | 2 + app/views/layouts/angular/_multi_auth_credentials.html.haml | 3 - app/views/static/auth-credentials.html.haml | 2 + 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
FIXED. Verified on 5.11.0.18.20190806180636_1dd6378.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199