Bug 152953 - (elinks) arrow keys are broken
(elinks) arrow keys are broken
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: elinks (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Karel Zak
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC4Target
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-03-31 04:37 EST by Jose Afonso Assuncao
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 0.10.3-2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-10 08:36:57 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jose Afonso Assuncao 2005-03-31 04:37:29 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050321 Firefox/1.0.2

Description of problem:
When we try to use the right key in elinks the browser gives keyboard code instead of following link.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Using the portuguese keyboard layout
2.Open elinks in a text console
3.click on the right key over a link 
  

Actual Results:  
but it gives information below "keyboard code: 218" and doesn't go anywere. 
note: other arrow keys work fine.


Expected Results:  It should follow the hiperlink.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Warren Togami 2005-05-02 03:21:00 EDT
It seems both Down and Right arrow keys are broken in elinks for me on x86_64
but not i386 in both gnome-terminal and text VT1.
Comment 2 Karel Zak 2005-05-05 12:19:15 EDT
What's your glibc version?

It looks same like bugreport: http://bugzilla.elinks.or.cz/show_bug.cgi?id=668
Comment 3 Warren Togami 2005-05-05 14:11:47 EDT
FC4 has glibc-2.3.5-4
Comment 4 Miloslav Trmač 2005-05-07 11:02:13 EDT
The upstream bug report contains a patch:
http://cvsweb.elinks.or.cz/cvsweb.cgi/elinks/src/viewer/text/view.c.diff?r1=1.687&r2=1.688&f=u
Comment 5 Miloslav Trmač 2005-05-10 08:36:57 EDT
Fixed in elinks-0.10.3-2. Thanks for your report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.