Additional info: As an administrator who is implementing a disaster recovery policy to protect data maintained in my RHHI 2.0 deployment, I need to understand what disaster recovery policies are available. This use case includes documenting overview information that includes the following content: (a) a brief statement as to the availability of geo-replication based disaster recovery for data maintained in an RHHI 2.0 deployment (b) the advantages of implementing disaster recovery in an active-passive mode with failback to the backed up site (c) a high-level overview of the implementation workflow (d) A cross-reference to the disaster recovery content available in the Maintaining Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure 2.0 documentation
Aravinda, are they any considerations in case of failback with geo-replication. Once the master site is restored with data from secondary site, should the geo-rep session be recreated?
(In reply to Sahina Bose from comment #8) > Aravinda, are they any considerations in case of failback with > geo-replication. Once the master site is restored with data from secondary > site, should the geo-rep session be recreated? Session already exists from Master site to secondary site. That is stopped while restoring data from secondary site. Once data is restored, this session needs to be started. (Secondary site to Primary site session need to be deleted)
Is this different from Bug 1531916? I've provided my inputs there.
Content about DR and recovery process looks good.