Bug 1533444 - [RHOS-10] [RHEL 7.5] Backport Nova commit 8075797 ("Support qemu >= 2.10 ")
Summary: [RHOS-10] [RHEL 7.5] Backport Nova commit 8075797 ("Support qemu >= 2.10 ")
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1646382
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-nova
Version: 10.0 (Newton)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: async
: 10.0 (Newton)
Assignee: Kashyap Chamarthy
QA Contact: Joe H. Rahme
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1533443
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-01-11 11:21 UTC by Kashyap Chamarthy
Modified: 2022-03-13 15:10 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1533443
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-12-05 09:02:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-13585 0 None None None 2022-03-13 15:10:16 UTC

Description Kashyap Chamarthy 2018-01-11 11:21:21 UTC
For RHEL 7.5 (comes out sometime in April-2018), the following Nova
upstream commit should be backported to RHOS-10 (given its long-term
support cycle):

    commit 807579755c4a116309eca5b2bcdbab9d1f393bab
    Author: Matt Riedemann <mriedem.os>
    Date:   Wed Sep 20 10:44:11 2017 -0400

        Support qemu >= 2.10

        Qemu 2.10 added the requirement of a --force-share flag to qemu-img
        info when reading information about a disk that is in use by a
        guest. We do this a lot in Nova for operations like gathering
        information before live migration.

        [...]

RHEL 7.5 will ship with QEMU 2.10, which will bring in an additional
flag '--force-share' — this is mandatory when running `qemu-img info` on
a live Nova instance.

Nova does this `qemu-img info` call in several places.

This change needs to be backported to RHOS-10, given its support life-cycle:

    RHOS-10: End of Production, Phase 2: December 16, 2019

Comment 1 Kashyap Chamarthy 2018-12-05 08:21:43 UTC
*** Bug 1654804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Kashyap Chamarthy 2018-12-05 09:02:01 UTC
Although this bug is older (and the actual backport fell through the cracks), marking it as duplicate of 1646382 (as it contains the backport).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1646382 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.