Bug 1535041 - Negative lookup caching mount options for GlusterFS
Summary: Negative lookup caching mount options for GlusterFS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1693084
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: core
Version: rhgs-3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Amar Tumballi
QA Contact: Rahul Hinduja
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1693084
Blocks: 1543779
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-01-16 14:30 UTC by Alexandre Porcelli
Modified: 2023-09-14 04:15 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-29 04:24:20 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Alexandre Porcelli 2018-01-16 14:30:24 UTC
Description of problem:

General Git operations have the potential to create hundreds of disk lookups, what has a negative impact on performance on GlusterFS. GlusterFS team has provided a negative lookup caching feature that can be enabled as a mount parameter.
We need that OpenShift supports mount parameters for GlusterFS storage.

Additional info:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RHDM-71

Comment 1 Diógenes Rettori 2018-01-16 14:52:21 UTC
It looks like this has been done upstream in Kube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535041

Next step is to verify if storage plugins need implement this as well.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2018-01-16 15:38:29 UTC
Mount options are implemented in OpenShift 3.6 as alpha / technology preview

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.7/architecture/additional_concepts/storage.html#pv-mount-options

In 3.8, it will be possible to set them in a storage class so all dynamically provisioned volumes will have the right mount options.

Is there anything missing?

Comment 11 Atin Mukherjee 2019-03-29 04:24:20 UTC
I'm closing this given this is tracked through BZ 1693084. We should have a different bug in OCS to allow the group-nl-cache profile to be applied in the storage class.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1693084 ***

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 04:15:32 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.