Bug 1539189 - Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY interface for Go
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY interface for Go
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jared Smith
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1539190
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-01-26 21:00 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2018-03-06 17:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 17:20:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jsmith.fedora: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2018-02-07 04:08:37 UTC
So how is this different from the existing golang-github-kr-pty, which appears to  still be under development and not dead?

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2018-02-07 10:02:07 UTC
Sadly it's a fork with custom modifications. Dev did that for a handful of packages without upstreaming their changes.

Comment 3 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2018-02-08 03:45:50 UTC
There's only really one significant commit; maybe you can try to convince the dev to send the changes upstream?

Comment 4 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2018-02-09 15:02:55 UTC
I already asked for two previous packages, the dev doesn't want to upstream is custom mod, says it would slow done the dev of his app.

Comment 5 Jared Smith 2018-02-19 15:48:19 UTC
Package is APPROVED.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 31 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/Reviews/1539189-golang-github-zyedidia-
     pty/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
     /usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/zyedidia(golang-github-zyedidia-
     tcell-devel, golang-github-zyedidia-poller-devel, golang-github-
     zyedidia-clipboard-devel, golang-github-zyedidia-glob-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc28.noarch.rpm
          golang-github-zyedidia-pty-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc28.src.rpm
golang-github-zyedidia-pty.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unix -> UNIX, Unix, uni
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/zyedidia/pty <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.



Requires
--------
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel:
    golang(github.com/zyedidia/pty)
    golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/zyedidia/pty/archive/30364665a2445782b12bcb2db75f16ce684da907/pty-3036466.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : b7f03f507b87aa9bf3503640c52313e3c9569e26531291ec45ba1feecfabe9f2
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b7f03f507b87aa9bf3503640c52313e3c9569e26531291ec45ba1feecfabe9f2


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1539189
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2018-02-19 22:31:14 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-zyedidia-pty

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2018-02-19 23:25:47 UTC
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9bd59bc220

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2018-02-20 18:18:35 UTC
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9bd59bc220

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2018-03-06 17:20:31 UTC
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.