RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1546739 - consistency in the replication error codes while setting nsds5replicaid=65535
Summary: consistency in the replication error codes while setting nsds5replicaid=65535
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 7.5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Matus Honek
QA Contact: RHDS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1725815
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-02-19 13:37 UTC by Amita Sharma
Modified: 2020-09-13 22:21 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.3.10.1-1.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1725815 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-31 19:46:14 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 3531 0 None closed Unify result codes for add and modify of repl5 config 2021-01-11 15:03:42 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:1064 0 None None None 2020-03-31 19:46:55 UTC

Description Amita Sharma 2018-02-19 13:37:55 UTC 
Description of problem:
This issue found during the verification of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533828

[root@qeos-34 upstream]# ldapmodify -h localhost -p 39001 -D "cn=Directory manager" -w password << EOF
> dn: cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> replace: nsDS5ReplicaId
> nsDS5ReplicaId: 65535
> EOF
modifying entry "cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config"
ldap_modify: Server is unwilling to perform (53)
	additional info: Attribute nsDS5ReplicaId value (65535) is invalid, must be a number between 1 and 65534.

[root@qeos-34 upstream]# ldapmodify -a -h localhost -p 389 -D "cn=Directory manager" -w Secret123 << EOF
> dn: cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
> cn: replica
> nsDS5Flags: 1
> nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=sync user,cn=config
> nsDS5ReplicaId: 65535
> nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=example,dc=com
> nsDS5ReplicaType: 3
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: nsDS5Replica
> objectClass: extensibleobject
> EOF
adding new entry "cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config"
ldap_add: Operations error (1)
	additional info: Attribute nsDS5ReplicaId value (65535) is invalid, must be a number between 1 and 65534.

In above two operations we have two different return codes - 
ldap_modify: Server is unwilling to perform (53) and ldap_add: Operations error (1) , For the same type of error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
389-ds-base-1.3.7.5-18.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to set nsDS5ReplicaId: 65535 by using ldapadd and also using ldapmodify
2. Both the times the output will give different error code.

Actual results:
Error codes are different for same error

Expected results:
Error codes should be same for same error
Comment 2 mreynolds 2018-11-30 17:15:36 UTC 
Assigning to Matus...

Hint, start looking in ldap/servers/plugins/replication/repl5_replica_config.c:

replica_config_modify() --> gives unwilling to perform (err=53)
replica_config_add()  --> give operations error(err=1)
Comment 6 sgouvern 2019-08-29 15:00:56 UTC 
Output of replica_config_test.py/test_same_attr_yields_same_return_code :

root@ci-vm-10-0-137-90 upstream]# py.test -v ds/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/replication/replica_config_test.py::test_same_attr_yields_same_return_code
======================================================================== test session starts =========================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.3, pytest-5.1.1, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.12.0 -- /opt/rh/rh-python36/root/usr/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.6.3', 'Platform': 'Linux-3.10.0-1077.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-redhat-7.8-Maipo', 'Packages': {'pytest': '5.1.1', 'py': '1.8.0', 'pluggy': '0.12.0'}, 'Plugins': {'metadata': '1.8.0', 'html': '1.22.0'}}
389-ds-base: 1.3.10.1-1.el7
nss: 3.44.0-5.el7
nspr: 4.21.0-1.el7
openldap: 2.4.44-21.el7_6
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.26-23.el7
FIPS: disabled
rootdir: /mnt/tests/rhds/tests/upstream/ds/dirsrvtests, inifile: pytest.ini
plugins: metadata-1.8.0, html-1.22.0
collected 1 item                                                                                                                                                     

ds/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/replication/replica_config_test.py::test_same_attr_yields_same_return_code PASSED                                                  [100%]
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2020-03-31 19:46:14 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1064
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.